7 Day Fridge MMS

Thanks for the testing Clint! Excellent photos by the way.

My experience with the test strips is that if I dilute enough to test at the high range (eg, 1ml cds + 9ml water) and it gets into the 250-500ppm range, then I get a reading that is twice as high as if I instead dilute to the 25-50ppm range.

With my CDS that I made every week for 6 months using the same method, I could take 1ml cds and add 9 ml of water and get a reading of 500ppm (therefore 5000ppm). But when I took the same cds and added 1ml to 2oz of water, then I would get a reading of 50ppm, and if I diluted it with 4oz of water then I would get a reading of 25 ppm (thus 3000ppm). So my cds tested at 5000ppm with the first method at the high end of the strips and it tested at 3000 ppm at the mid range of the strips. I did this numerous times. The reading varies depending on the range you are using on the test strips.

Same problem exists with the eXact chlorine photometer device I purchased which eliminates the human eyesight variable. Still had variations in readings depending on the dilution and range you are using on the device.

So PPM testing is not an exact science and it is important to specify the dilution used to get a certain reading. So appreciate that Clint and Pam.

Michael

Hi Michael,
I'm a bit confused. You said,
"1ml cds and add 9 ml of water and get a reading of 500ppm (therefore 5000ppm). But when I took the same cds and added 1ml to 2oz of water, then I would get a reading of 50ppm"
2oz is not double 9 ml, right? 2oz is 1/4 cup which is 60 ml. Or am I reading you wrong?

Scott

Hi Scott,

I'm not entirely clear on your question. 2oz is 60ml, so a 50ppm reading is 50x60= 3000 ppm. So what I am saying is the dilution you use to test, will give 2 different readings on the ppm. This is a big problem. I have mentioned it before but no one else seems to be discussing it.

Same problem exists with the eXact chlorine photometer device which uses an electronic eye to take the reading. The accuracy varies depending on the range you are using. The mid range is supposed to be more accurate you would think. So diluting down to the 50-100ppm range on the test strips should be more accurate, but it will probably cut the ppm in half.

Michael

Hi Michael,
I understand now. I was just confused because you started by mentioning milliliters and then mentioned ounces. But I get it now. Wow, that is a huge difference in readings. Almost double the ppm. What number do you go with? Do you just add both numbers together and then divide by 2? 5000 + 3000 = 8000/2 = 4000? I guess, in lieu of a more accurate method, one would have to do this, eh?

Thanks for clearing it up for me.

All the best,
Scott

Hi Michael,
I just re-read what you said (again) and it would seem that the the lower number (3000 ppm) is probably the better, more accurate one, since you got the same reading on both the 2oz and 4oz (60ml and 120ml) dilutions, right?

Scott

I have been being conservative and saying it is 3000 ppm, but based on the device readings I think the real number is probably 4500 ppm, thus in the middle. Better to be too strong that too weak the way I look at it.

Michael

Thanks Michael,

I agree, it is beter to error on the higher ppm's when testing.

Scott: I will save some of the Fridge MMS for a week and then test it again. My girlfriend and I are using it both, and it is going fast..... we are doing a 3-4 drop protocol for 10 hours (starting at 5-6am) for 3 weeks. We are using peppermint & Licorice root tea to mask the taste of the MMS1 (fridge).

Michael: In the next few days I am going to use CDI (Chlorine Dioxide Injection) into the muscles, and add the MMS (sodium chlorite) only to the CDS to make it more alkaline (as per our conversation). I have been feeling sluggish and dragging the last couple of days, as my body has been de-toxing pretty good.... but with NO nausea (only slight) or diarrhea. I couldn't handle the MMS basic (with baking soda) so I switched to Scott's formula with the tea, and it seems to be working well.

Will keep you guys posted,

Clint

Ok Clint, thanks again, and thank you too Michael.
Scott

Thanks, Michael. I discovered that, too, but was never able to codify it as well as you did in your post. Now I can see why Andreas likes color .

So Pam, you had the same problem where one dilution of CDS at the high range of the strips gives you a reading of 5000ppm for example, and a greater dilution more to the mid range of the strips gave you a reading like 3000ppm?

No one else has confirmed this phenomena, but I have done it countless times and it is always the same. I've made a quite a bit of CDS in the last 8 months and have confirmed this numerous times. So I know myself what happens, but we have not documented this with confirmation yet here on the forum.

Thank you,

Michael