Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
For more MMS Testimonials: mmstestimonials.is

TOPIC:

HIV/AIDs current protocol by Jim Humble 18 Jan 2013 10:28 #29325

  • ZnzMagic
  • ZnzMagic's Avatar
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
I agree one should atleast give it a go before jumping to a conclusion, with live experience only can one make a good comment, and just as an after thought how many of us did their first protocols using perhaps pineapple juice or any other juice to dilute the activated MMS, it is said that activated MMS has best results using water to dilute and by having used a juice say in a pre mixed 8 or 10 hour dosage the effect and detoxing properties of MMS are lost and thus chances of fast success are diminished.

It is a well known fact that MMS is the strongest killer of all pathogens known to man, perhaps the 95% success rate claimed is high, but when used correctly MMS can and will help you detox allowing your own body to heal itself faster......

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

HIV/AIDs current protocol by Jim Humble 18 Jan 2013 22:07 #29359

  • sankar
  • sankar's Avatar
  • Offline
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Posts: 13
  • Thank you received: 9
Hi Roze and David,

Thanks for your encouraging comments!

Roze - as for your question about testing...

I check my CD4, VL, CBC and few other markers quite regularly, not to see if and when I need to start medication, but to measure my expected progress. I see all those numbers as good indicators of where I am and where I'm heading. Most people here on this forum seem to follow those numbers. The other bad thing about medication, is that it messes up those numbers so it's hard to measure the real progress. That's of course on top of the fact that they might kill us. While measuring progress, I think that self-observation guided by intuition and listening to one's physical feelings, as well as proper lab testing make a good combination when trying to measure any progress.

David - not meaning to judge anything yet.

As I wrote, those were some conclusions on my thoughts so far, and were meant to spark a conversation about the things I've paid attention to, so I could understand the reasons behind them. I understand where you come from, in the sense that you've probably treated tons of people with MMS. Therefore from your perspective, a 100% belief in MMS is something you take for granted. It's a good place to be.

However, I come from a different place. I've been testing treatments and philosophies, many which were found from websites and forums just like this - which one after the another proved to be inefficient despite many claims people made about them. It makes one skeptic. I want and will try MMS too, with great expectations. But is it wrong to have fears and doubts after many disappointments? We all know web is full of weird claims, and I'm still watching all this from an outsiders perspective. I'm new to this, remember.

Without knowing better, I could guess that one of the big obstacles between wider use and spreading of MMS among people is the way many are suspicious and fearful when they initially find out about the product. The better that can be fought, the more people will try MMS. I like the way Jim tackles his critics in the book.

I will keep posting here to inform about my progress. And probably will ask many annoying questions. :cheer:
The following user(s) said Thank You: Researcher

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Last edit: by sankar.

HIV/AIDs current protocol by Jim Humble 19 Jan 2013 08:29 #29371

  • Roze
  • Roze's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Senior Member
  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 63
  • Thank you received: 83
Sankar,

I'd also suggest you read latest jim's book as it might answer some of your questions and disbelieves and justify it with scientifical data which you can later confirm with other sources.
I'd also suggest researching what cd4 and VL really measure.
The following user(s) said Thank You: sankar

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

HIV/AIDs current protocol by Jim Humble 19 Jan 2013 09:51 #29373

  • sankar
  • sankar's Avatar
  • Offline
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Posts: 13
  • Thank you received: 9
Thanks Roze. The book I have is Master Mineral of the Third Millenium, 2011 edit. A good book. Is this the latest one or are you referring to something more recent? I'll probably read all of them as time passes. I find this subject interesting.

What comes to CD4 and VL testing, yes... I'm very analytic person and like to study things from both sides of the spectrum. I know that there is some controversy related to those tests and what they really mean and measure. I've had long conversations with both dissidents and MDs, and also researchers, to get understanding from both sides. As I'm not a professional in that field and don't have enough understanding of human physiology, I don't want to draw a final conclusion as to who is right.

What I know though is that both of those numbers, whatever they measure in the end, are closely tied to the progress of this "disease" or whatever one chooses to believe it is. And I like to see what goes on inside, to understand more what goes on on the outside. There are many other interesting markers, for example the gluthatione level, which tends to go down a lot in these cases, and correct supplementation is beneficial I believe.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Last edit: by sankar.