question-circle Graphene oxide causing what is falsely being referred to a Covid-19.

More
25 Jul 2021 06:23 #70207 by Kingb
Hm, she actually only discredits Ricardo Delgado's study and the origin of the sample. At ~1 hour and 47 minutes, she can't even pronounce chlorine dioxide or andreas kalcker's name correctly. So she doesn't seem to know MMS or CDS. That makes me somehow skeptical about her knowledge.

But further I don't understand how she explains the sudden magnetism? Did I miss the part in the video? Because she only went into the "normal" side effects but she have no other explanation for it...

And whether the vaccine consists now of graphene or some other patented fullerene (i.e. a similar carbon compound) would also be a good question. Because after all, when I specifically look for sugar, I'm not thinking of artificial sweeteners like aspartame, acesulfame-K, etc.. Because it can also be this Darpa hydrogel or other carbon nanotubes or even C60 or similar compounds. And they certainly look similar but slightly different under an light and electron microscope. 

And if the so-called fact-checkers and official media have already taken up the graphene issue and denied it, I think there's something to it.

But of course, the whole thing can also be a hoax or a misdirection.

But even the masks contain graphene, which has been confirmed even by official sources. 

Example of masks with graphene:
healthycanadians.gc.ca/recall-alert-rappel-avis/hc-sc/2021/75309a-eng.php#:~:text=Health%20Canada%20is%20advising%20Canadians,have%20antiviral%20and%20antibacterial%20properties .

And I mean you can't get your hands on the vaccines and the real ingredients are still unknown. This is for example a (German) website where one can ask the state or official agencies and then get an answer from the official authorities that is posted publicly. Here the Robert Koch Institute says that they still do not know what is contained in the vaccines and have not done their own research. But even if they had, I don't think I would trust them.

fragdenstaat.de/anfrage/anfrage-an-die-stiko-bezuglich-graphene-in-biontech-pfizer-und-moderna-impfstoffen/

And when I look at who has already confirmed the graphene, I think that the video of Whitney Webb is somewhat questionable. She accuses these people of having no idea and interprets everything in her own way.

- Prof. Dr. Pablo Campra Madrid
- Prof. Dr. Nauk Dr. med. Enrico Edinger
- Biophysicist Andreas Kalcker
- Dr. José Luis Sevillano

Because if professors and doctors confirm the study and she refutes it, well... of course it have not to be correct and even professors make mistakes... like I said it could be a hoax... and she's maybe right that it doesn't have to be graphene, but as I said, there are other similar substances that aren't even considered from her. She sits there for 2 hours and tries to disprove something for which she also has no other explanation.

Because if you don't know what is contained in the vaccines, you can't talk about graphene, lipid nanoparticles or spike proteins. That's why I think (because of the occurring magnetism) the graphene (or other fullerne) topic is very appropriate. 

But let's see what comes out over the next time. There will certainly be more people doing their research soon.
The following user(s) said Thank You: JimH1954

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • JimH1954
  • JimH1954's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Elite Member
  • Elite Member
More
25 Jul 2021 10:21 #70209 by JimH1954
@Kingb

You're right, Whitney doesn't explain the magnetism at all.

This is in Spanish with English subtitles which includes the Andreas Katckers talk you posted a day or so ago.

rumble.com/vk7lap-andreas-kalckers-team-confirms-evidence-of-graphene-oxide-in-vaccines.html?mref=lveqv&mc=48pz1
 
The following user(s) said Thank You: Kingb

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • JimH1954
  • JimH1954's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Elite Member
  • Elite Member
More
29 Jul 2021 14:21 - 29 Jul 2021 14:22 #70263 by JimH1954
This Graphene Oxide in the Covid jabs refuses to die.

I like the way Karen Kingston stayed with the facts that she knows. Save the opinions for MSM. 

brandnewtube.com/watch/deadly-shots-former-pfizer-employee-confirms-poison-in-c-19-vaxx_KRzQED8lhKWRY3y.html
Last edit: 29 Jul 2021 14:22 by JimH1954.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Kingb

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
29 Jul 2021 14:54 #70265 by Kingb
Hm, I remember that these polyethylene glycols (PEG) without graphene (or maybe with, who knows) I have also found in normal shower gels (which ironically were suitable for allergy sufferers) and have read that they are all carcinogenic. But it would make sense if people also shower and wash with these PEG substances (of which there are many) so that a kind of nanofilm is formed even on the skin and hair. I mean, the skin also breathes. If the skin can absorb less oxygen in this way and becomes more electrically conductive (by any carbon or graphene layers), this would speak for the agenda. So one should eat the graphene, drink it, inhale it, shower with it and let it inject into oneself... well... pretty sick...

Also, all the websites that are currently advertising this graphene derivative called C60 are extremely eye-catching to me at the moment. C60 is also a modified carbon compound just like graphene. And they all advertise that you can get rid of graphene, among other things. I find this very strange especially since all modified carbon compounds are supposed to be very toxic and all the sites advertise that it is super healthy...

Another question that arises in my mind; is DMSO more effective or MSM? Or is it maybe similar? Because DMSO produces MSM in our body and MSM then produces the needed glutathione, N-acetylcysteine, taurine, etc.. But which would be more effective or more useful? Does anyone have an explanation or a theory?
The following user(s) said Thank You: JimH1954

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
01 Aug 2021 05:29 #70293 by Mr. Ali
I would like to propose a theory that I have to remove the Graphene Dioxide from the body.

And that is by way of sound vibrations.

This was inspired to me from Spiderman 3.  Watch this YT video on Venom's demise and how Spiderman used sound vibrations to pull the black goo from his body.


There is no doubt and question that sound vibrations can be and has been used for healing.  I am currently do it now.  

We know that Graphene Dioxide is attracted to frequency, so I believe if we can find the right frequency, the graphene will pull itself out of the body through the skin.  Without damaging the skin or the tissues in the body.  Skin and tissues can regenerate on their own, however, you cannot regenerate from death.

Here is a fequency tone generator that I found online.
www.szynalski.com/tone-generator/

I have not taken the vaccine nor do I have any plans to do so, but maybe someone reading this message has taken it and is willing to see the reaction of playing different frequencies on their body.

Maybe I am right or maybe I am wrong, but so far there is not very many options available for these vaccinated people to get the graphene out of their bodies.

Spiderman 3 came out in 2007.  Maybe it was forecasting graphene dioxide in the movie and also forecasting the solution.  Sound Vibrations.

I will give some healing frequencies that one can test with in the next post.
Thanks.

Let's get everyone healthy with MMS and DMSO and bankrupt Big Pharma!
The following user(s) said Thank You: Kingb

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
02 Aug 2021 08:51 - 02 Aug 2021 09:02 #70303 by Kingb
@Mr. Ali

An interesting (and very extensive) topic/theory. So I have read up a bit and what I write here must not be true and if someone can explain it to me differently (or explain me where I am wrong) I would be very grateful. I am, of course, a non-expert in this area and I am simply writing down my thoughts (with some sources) on the subject.

I personally do not believe that sound frequencies can have such an impact on graphene (not that sound frequencies do not have effects, but not like these). Because inside of us humans there is also a (even if small) amount of e.g. copper and other (more or less) conductive materials with which the same should happen under certain audio frequencies. 

I think one must consider the whole thing a little more comprehensively. We have a very wide spectrum of frequencies which lie in our range of perception - but a much larger spectrum escapes our (conscious) perception.

A small excerpt from Wikipedia:

"The human ear is sensitive to frequencies from a maximum of about 16 hertz to 20 kHz, and the human eye is sensitive in a wavelength range from about 380 nm (violet) to 780 nm (red)."

Quelle:
de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wellenl%C3%A4nge

That is why, for example, we do not hear the ultrasound and we do not see the infrared light. Also the Schumann resonance we cannot hear consciously or perceive because of it. The spectrum of what we can perceive consciously is actually very small.

Whereas the light and the sound are both frequencies. For example 440 Hz is an audio frequency (music note A) and if we leave the Hz range and go much higher, we come into the light spectrum. For example, far infrared has a frequency of 20 THz. Then in between are things like microwaves, broadcasting, etc..

Good source:
de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wellenl%C3%A4nge#/media/Datei:Electromagnetic_spectrum_-de_c.svg

With the frequencies, it goes higher and higher. It starts with Hz, then comes kHz, then MHz, then GHz and finally THz. So you could say that you could see the 5G radiation with your eyes if it was in our "perceptible spectrum". But we could also hear the radiation if our ears could perceive such frequencies (which of course is not the case).

Also fitting to the topic:
slideplayer.com/slide/15082194/91/images/12/Almost+all+electromagnetic+waves+are+invisible+for+the+same+reason+you+cannot+see+the+magnetic+field+between+two+magnets..jpg

So we perceive ultrasound and the things that we do not perceive consciously, thus unconsciously or need devices that perceive these frequencies for us. So for example a router for the W-Lan or a cell phone for GSM, 4G, 5G etc..

Which is not to say that sound has no influence on our body (of course it has an influence), because there is also light therapy, etc. but that it can extract substances from our bodies (like in the spiderman movie) I think is a bold statement. So at least sound frequencies. If we go higher it has of course also effects on our bodies which one can also notice (like one could cook eyeballs by 5G or trigger a heart attack for example).

And what I do not want to deny is that there are certain frequencies that have healing properties (example Nikola Tesla's devices and various other frequency devices for healing purposes) and if you are stuffed with graphene possibly also help to remove the graphene in some way and heal the body. There are some good examples and reviews regarding those devices (and of course also fake devices).

But that with sound frequencies such substances swell through our skin, I think is not possible (for the reasons above).

Also it would be too simple with the help of a "normal radio" for example to detoxify mankind from the graphene in a short time. I believe that the "elite" who planned this has probably also considered such things.

But I would love to see the healing frequencies you still want to post. I assume the Schumann resonance frequency of 7.83 Hz is one of them? What else?

Nevertheless, an interesting train of thought that stimulated me very much to investigate. Thanks for it.
Last edit: 02 Aug 2021 09:02 by Kingb.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Mr. Ali, JimH1954, Louisesilver

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
02 Aug 2021 09:23 #70305 by gray
Hmmm and they just had the biggest typhoon to shut the hole district down including the airport 🤨 karmas a bitch 😬

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
02 Aug 2021 09:25 #70306 by gray
Love your chosen name on here haha was gonna say Shanghai just had a typhoon and int karma a bitch lol no offence intended toward you lol

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Aug 2021 04:22 #70311 by Mr. Ali
Thanks for your input KingB

I wanted to suggest these frequencies based on the tuning forks that are used by Eileen McKusick.  From her book, Tuning the Human Biofield.

These are the frequencies that she uses and this is based on her 23 years of study in the field with sound vibrations.

Maybe a vaccinated person can try these frequencies using the Tone Generator that I posted earlier and see what happens inside their bodies.  

174 hz
582 hz
417 hz
54.81 hz
62.64 hz
93.96 hz

What would be interesting to try are using two frequencies 54.81 and 62.64 played together.  That is on your computer play one frequency 54.81 and from another computer or your phone open the website and play 62.64 and sit in between your computer speaker and phone speaker and see the effect of using both frequencies together.

 

Let's get everyone healthy with MMS and DMSO and bankrupt Big Pharma!
The following user(s) said Thank You: Kingb

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Aug 2021 07:24 - 03 Aug 2021 07:26 #70312 by Kingb
@gray

Hmm... I assume you are referring to the topic of "weather weapons"? Because otherwise I don't know how the topic should fit in here. But of course our weather is not only influenced by chemtrails but also by frequencies nowadays (i.e. worldwide HAARP stations, geoengineering etc.). The nuclear catastrophe of Fukushima was probably also triggered this way. And I think very many storms and natural disasters are artificially created to generate now a big chaos from which they want to create order again at the end, according to the motto; order out of chaos. One example took place here in Germany. We had a pretty big flood in a large area a few days/weeks ago. The first thing that arrived in the crisis zone was not official authorities helping (fortunately many volunteers helped) but a vaccination bus with huge advertising signs. Official relief workers did not start helping until a week later. Also TV reporters came with rubber boots there and smeared themselves briefly for the recordings dirt in the face and lied on TV that they would help for days there. These are crazy times we live in.

@Mr. Ali

Thank you for the frequencies. The list could be extended with some describtions after a short search possibly in such a way:

174 Hz - Pain Relief Pure Tone Sleep Music
582 Hz - Music to Boost Positivity & Reduce Stress
417 Hz - Wipes out all the Negative Energy
54.81 Hz - Schumann Resonance Tuning Fork
62.64 Hz - Schumann Resonance Tuning Fork
93.96 Hz - Sonic Slider Frequency

But this makes me think even more...

"Our bodies are made up of dynamic, pulsing electromagnetic fields. The health of our electrical system deeply informs our physiology and the functioning of every organ and system in the body."

Source:
electrichealth.com/

And exactly the electromagnetic field of the vaccinated persons is completely changed by the graphene penetrating into the cell membrane and thus changing our DNA. So as soon as graphene combines with hydrogen, one becomes magnetic, among other things. One could say that the aura (and the whole magnetic field) of the people changes thereby.

And another point why I don't think audio frequencies will help against graphene is that everywhere the 5G network is being rolled out. I think only the 5G frequencies have a noticeable impact on graphene, which is the reason why it is being installed so fast (almost) everywhere. I think that since the graphene spreads and accumulates in the organs (i.e. also in the brain), it is possible to read out brain waves but also to rewrite or manipulate them.

Since the electromagnetic field of humans has been changed and they can be influenced or manipulated, it must be assumed that it is more a kind of biological robot (or Human 2.0 as part of the IoT) that can be remotely fed memories, emotions or feelings (by those 5G frequencies). Even the IQ, the ability to concentrate and many other things can very likely be remotely controlled by it.

But if one only assumes (mind-) control at frequencies from 2 gigahertz up to 60 gigahertz (i.e. the 5G frequencies), one has to ask oneself whether normal audio frequencies in the normal Hz range can have any effect at all on the vaccinated persons. 

That would be like me saying (just one example) that turmeric can cure cancer, but what you rarely read about it is that you would have to consume at least 10-15 grams of turmeric every day (that's a really big pile!). From my point of view, no turmeric extract will help, because it will be much too expensive with such high concentrations that are required. One finds a substance in turmeric and says it would cure cancer, which is true. But that the dosage has to be extremely high for it to work, hardly anyone tells you that. And I don't want to say that turmeric is bad or anything, it definitely has those effects but hardly anyone takes as much turmeric as it would be needed.

But these are only my thoughts and no facts. Because you can also call it an experiment on humanity where we do not yet know the long-term effects (various mutations, Alzheimer's, different brain damages, etc.).
Last edit: 03 Aug 2021 07:26 by Kingb.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Mr. Ali

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.351 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum