Graphene oxide causing what is falsely being referred to a Covid-19.

Is Graphene Oxide Causing What Is Falsely Being Referred to as ‘Covid-19?’ By  Gary D. Barnett July 6, 2021

www.lewrockwell.com/2021/07/gary-d-barnett/is-graphene-oxide-causing-what-is-falsely-being-referred-to-as-covid-19/

Will CDS/MMS be able to handle graphene oxide?

As an oxide I would think CDS or MMS would deal with this in short order.

Thoughts?

Jim in Canada​​​​​​​

anna von reitz wrote on this topic yesterday; Head's Up, People: 
There is practically NO evidence that this "vaccine" is gene therapy. There
is ZERO genetic material: mRNA or DNA or spike protein. It means this
"vaccine" has nothing to do with a so-called virus. This product wasn't
developed to avoid an infection caused by a virus. The true purpose of this
product remains hidden. No official statement from governments or health
institutions has been made. The toxicity of graphene oxide is reason
enough to stop the global vaccination program.

Logic dictates that an oxidizing ion (Clo2) will have little to no effect on already oxidized materials. The molecular bond is reassociated so I fail to see how Clo2 could get to “see” graphene oxide or any bonded oxygen molecule. 

Hopefully I’m wrong but thats my understand as of now. 

The solution is; don’t take the F...ing Vax.

So, are they also putting graphene oxide in chemtrails too? 

That is what I have been thinking about, too. 

I am very glad that the topic is being addressed here and I had read something strange in the last few days that made me think.

"Graphene oxide is a carbon-based 2D nanomaterial usually produced by reacting graphite with a strong oxidizing agent followed by aqueous workup."

Source: de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphenoxid

This would mean that when we inhale (the precursor) graphite or absorb it into our body, then with the help of CDS and our body water we chemically produce this graphene inside of us or am I misunderstanding something?

Because CDS/MMS would be (maybe) a strong oxidant, which is needed for the production of graphene (on the chemical way)?

To remove graphene from the bodies I have read that you can use nicotine and ethanol. Does anyone know more about this? But that would mean you become an alcohol drinker, chain smoker or you become a bio robot? Because graphene is a better electromagnetic conductor than copper or any other known material. What would also explain the appearing magnetism. Therefore it can interact with the electromagnetic radiation of the 5G towers if I have understood all this correctly.

Does anyone know if chemtrails contain graphite? Or whether CDS is helpful or can be used for graphene production?

Kingb, you've brought up some great issues.

I don't have any answers but would certainly like to get more clarity on all the issues involved.

Thanks.

Yes, I have also seen a video (fortunately only one so far, so it could also be a fake but i don't know... and who has a black light tube these days?) where you can see under a black light a kind of luciferase effect inside the body after the (so called) vaccination. So a kind of "not fakeable" body tattoo (which should act and resemble a fingerprint) that is not visible at first but can be read by smartphones and certain devices even during the day. So people can then determine whether you have really been vaccinated (so whether you are a connected and working bio robot) or not. However, black light would then have to be banned in discos and bars. That's why I think the luciferase video "could" be a possible fake. Even if it would make sense. Why should you let people glow when you can read and write to the whole bodysystem (as part of the IoT) alone with the help of the graphene.

That these transhumanist delusions will somehow be forced into reality should be clear to everyone who deals with it intensively and longer. And it really seems like we're in the middle of these delusions. 

Which would also speak against the spike protein and its spread. Because Stefan Lanka refutes very plausibly the virus theory and the whole virology. This would explain why the references to the spike protein that is allegedly distributed can only be found on the vaccine manufacturer's website (which of course should not be trusted) and on pages or articles that refer to it as a source. Let's assume there are no viruses (but only malnutrition and toxins or trauma), there can be no spike proteins. Because a virus was never isolated if I understood Stefan Lanka correctly. That means the lies already started with HIV and Aids which is also tested with this useless PCR test. What this Spike Protein story does, however, is divide the society in a way that has never been done before.

But I think that would be another topic for itself. And the "no virus" - theory also has many opponents (for entire professions and half the economy are based on the virus theory - without an isolate). So I don't want to go into any more detail about it. 

But just the graphene topic in connection with CDS/MMS (and 5G) concerns me for real very much.

Kingb you raise some very thought provoking points: 

“This would mean that when we inhale (the precursor) graphite or absorb it into our body, then with the help of CDS and our body water we chemically produce this graphene inside of us or am I misunderstanding something?” 

Graphene is fundamentally ground graphite if one was to inhale such the oxygen in the air we also inhale and is in our bloodstream would oxidise the graphene to graphene oxide.

“But just the graphene topic in connection with CDS/MMS (and 5G) concerns me for real very much” 

Does CDS/MMS have an affect on graphene? Not sure but would think it unlikely due to the nature of the charge but this is irrelevant as the oxygen we breath is enough to oxidise graphene. The 5g point is a whole other rabbit hole as the brilliant Robert Murry Smith shows, graphene oxide is a Piezoelectric generator, a receiver and to combine the two maybe a transmitter all of which could be affected or even manipulated by external electro motive force or radio waves.



pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/nn204198g#

This video answered some of the questions I had.

I have found a video  Here  that says around the 19 minute mark that CLO2 won't work against Graphene Oxide.
And it mentions what will work. NAC apparently works best.(see text below)
Here the the link if the above here doesn't work. 
rumble.com/vjfddf-la-quinta-columna-at-the-xxvii-humanitarian-conference-of-comusav-conuvive.html?mref=3bvu5&mc=7pzjf

This link includes an English text translation of the above Spanish video. 

truthcomestolight.com/on-the-connection-between-graphene-oxide-found-in-covid-vaccines-electromagnetic-fields-blood-clots-severe-covid-symptoms-how-to-remove-graphene-oxide-from-the-body/

A possible important excerpt from the link above:

"On the other hand, I have been asked about the efficacy of chlorine dioxide. That goes another way. What it does is to oxygenate the cell, it prepares it so that it is not easily destroyed by this toxicant. What glutathione would do is to provide the army with more numbers of soldiers in terms of glutathione to deal with toxins. What we have found, as I say, is that most of the treatments that have been with N-acetylcysteine or glutathione and even with other antioxidants such as astaxanthin, which is a powerful antioxidant, have been very favorable treatments for the patients".