CDH Plus 1000

Edwin3110 wrote: Virginal Washing (douche)

500ml water + 10ml CDH + 5 drops SC

Wash 3 times a day.

Thanks Edwin.

If you're using the formulation for CDH that Charlotte and I developed, your 10ml of base CDH should be right around 3500 ppm. When you then add that to 500ml of water you should be at about 70 ppm of CLO2 in the solution plus the extra sodium chlorite you've added.

I'm using the following dilution calculator to figure that out:

www.endmemo.com/bio/dilution.php (using the last one on the page)

Keep up the good work,
Scott

Medical Report comes out for the lady Virginal Washing is now fully recover.

I have found the link regarding non activated SC not to be used as advice by Jim Humble.

Do not take Unactivated SC

Edwin, the Jim Humble quote by Paul was from a pre-release version of MMS Health Recovery Guidebook and is NOT in the final version. In other words, Jim Humble has changed his mind since 21 April 2016.

Also, www.facebook.com/groups/SCSINFO/ is a group of 13,139 members who ingest unactivated MMS on a regular basis. They have even had many autism recoveries using this method. Here is their autism FB link: www.facebook.com/groups/SCSINFOAUSTISM/ with 3090 members.

Jim knows about the G2C forum thread Non-Acidified Sodium Chlorite for Disease Prevention and Healing and has not had it removed. He also says that unactivated MMS is useful inside the body.

Thanks for the info CLO2, i will go through the latest e-book to see.

Meantime, We would wish Archbishop Jim Humble himself to clear off this matter in writing for us here is the best i assume.

My final conclusions is that, weather SC can be taken without activation for no harm or harming, maybe Jim Humble assume it is too early to say now as he did mention that the toxic could be build up very slow or un notice.

My suggestion would be to used my CDH Plus 1000 protocol which is still within MMS objective of having both CD and SC during ingestion. If one feel the SC is bringing more healing benefits, one can always used lesser CD and add more SC.

This protocol can be used also in original MMS1 Protocol 1000. One may activated 1drop MMS1 and add into water, then add SC as much one believed to give healing benefits.

Hi Edwin,
When a person activates 3 drops over a 30 second time period as Jim recommends and then adds the water and drinks it, only from 7 to 10% of the sodium chlorite has been activated and the other 90 to 93% of the sodium chlorite activates in the stomach. So in the case of a 3 drop dose, there is at least 2.7 drops of unactivated sodium chlorite going into a person's stomach. I'm only suggesting about 1 drop at a time for an adult.

When Charlotte and I formulated the CDH that you're using in this "CDH Plus 1000" idea of yours, we formulated it so that after the activation process occurs, it's about 50% activated, leaving about half of the sodium chlorite to still activate in the stomach. So in the case of a 3ml dose of CDH, a person would still get about 1.5 drops of unactivated sodium chlorite and we know Jim approved that.

What you're suggesting though, is to take the CDH that Charlotte and I created and add even more sodium chlorite to it and you think that should be okay. So why do you think that taking 1 drop of sodium chlorite unactivated would be some kind of a problem? People have been taking far more than that since the time that Jim discovered sodium chlorite.

I hope this clarifies things for you some and reassures others of the safety and benefits of taking drops of sodium chlorite as I've suggested here on the forum at the following link:

g2cforum.org/index.php/list/mms-mms1-research/30839-non-acidified-sodium-chlorite-for-disease-prevention-and-healing

Take care,
Scott

Hi Scott

I believed you can understand my thinking when i compare CDS and CDH for using it as my protocol call CDH Plus 1000.

In healing, i would like to stick to the original as close possible because it is where the effective solution is found. And i found that by making too much variation that end up to the same path is of adding more confusion.

It would be better to teach people that MMS is capable to make it variation in the term of used without the need to change to any other protocol or out of MMS effective used.

Last benefits by maintaining both CD and SC should be one of the safest route in terms of worrying toxicity of leaching heavy metal inside body that seems possible.

As we both understood, inactivate SC is high effective against parasites but as when this parasites is killed, they do release toxic and this is where CD are more effective in clearing it up as well.

Again, i always believed Jim Humble knowledge and reasons to even not mentioned it as he may feel there is something completely not safe to ingest inactivate SC. He is the founder who research more than anyone that he could simply answer it to us be it in the book or response to our doubts. But he just cannot make up his mind. So we must assume there are possibility of un-safe used.

and yes, i used the CDH version created by you and CLO2. And been using it few years with good success. I also found that many disease response to CD without the need of SC. Only in serious cases i would add in SC and see results gets better and faster. It also help those cannot take high dose of CD or some may feel the biting sensation in throat when on stronger CD.

So Jim Humble is not wrong in his MMS as he stated the original always bring results. It means the present of both CD and SC during ingestion. But again, if we play out both CD and SC, the healing seems to be able to find tune without the need of changing protocol and the safety of MMS used will be in place as well. No one need to risk to test protocol effectiveness. The problems only lies on the amount of CD and SC one body needed for effective healing.

Hope this will get to a point of correct way to improved MMS usage and that MMS is capable to heal effectively without the need to change its originally discover methods and proven to be the best healing that can be further improved its effectiveness by knowing how to adjust both CD and SC inside MMS.

Hi Edwin,
Yes I now understand what you're trying to do. You're trying to keep the CDH as close to activated drops as possible because the drops are what Jim Humble has said works the best. So you're trying to keep the ratio of CLO2 to Sodium Chlorite the same or as close as possible to drops.

If I'm right in understanding you, then the best way to accomplish keeping that ratio about the same would be to use 1% HCl when you make your CDH. By using 1% HCl, you will be providing only enough HCl to activate the Sodium Chlorite about 12.5%, which is approximately the same amount of activation that occurs in the 30 second time period that Jim recommends. I call this type of CDH, "CDH-1%" as apposed to "CDH-2%" which uses 2% HCl and allows for an approximate 25% activation of the Sodium Chlorite. "CDH-4%" is our standard CDH which uses 4% HCl and activates approximately 50% of the Sodium Chlorite.

Of course making 1% is very easy to do; just add 1ml of 4% HCl to 3ml of pure water (ideally distilled). This will give you a total of 4ml of 1% HCl. To make 40ml of 1% HCl, add 10ml of 4% HCl to 30ml of water.

Hope that helps and thanks for all that you do Edwin.

All the best,
Scott

Actually what I mean is to keep the main principal of MMS1. Because MMS1 is the one that give the most wide range healing of diseases.

I like CDH is because I can make a volume to keep for longer used... but this CDH will soon loose out all the SC with time.

With CDH Plus 1000, I could bring back the benefits like MMS1 minus it's mixing hassle no worry of reduce benefits like MMS1.

This same concept can also be apply to original MMS1 activating method as well.

Let say if one need more available SC in MMS1, one can also adjust the ratio of activator or less activating time so that less CD is generate for ingestion.

As the whole objective is to understand that we can control CD and SC in MMS for ingestion. But maintain original MMS1 objective for safety ingestion is to have both CD and SC all the time together for oral taking.