- Posts: 123
- Thank you received: 15
Welcome to MMS Forum!
We encourage new members to post a short introduction of themselves in this forum category. Get to know your fellow board members and their interests and skills. Please come and participate in educating people about the healing miracle that is MMS, and join the movement to make it available to the World!
We encourage new members to post a short introduction of themselves in this forum category. Get to know your fellow board members and their interests and skills. Please come and participate in educating people about the healing miracle that is MMS, and join the movement to make it available to the World!
Digital Scales
- vector
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
- Life Is Good
Less
More
11 Oct 2012 15:20 - 11 Oct 2012 15:26 #24770
by vector
Digital Scales was created by vector
I have been researching digital scales and I would appreciate some feedback on this scale. I know it is only a 300g capacity and there may be a BIG problem for leaking. Is this overkill for the purpose of MMS/MMS2/CDS making?
Or maybe this?
www.oldwillknottscales.com/jennings-jscale-cj600.html
I would appreciate some feedback/opinions
Thanks!
Or maybe this?
www.oldwillknottscales.com/jennings-jscale-cj600.html
I would appreciate some feedback/opinions
Thanks!
Last edit: 11 Oct 2012 15:26 by vector. Reason: add item
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- fourfingerz
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- I'm rooting for you - we're all in this together
Less
More
- Posts: 544
- Thank you received: 558
11 Oct 2012 15:45 #24771
by fourfingerz
Martin
Replied by fourfingerz on topic Digital Scales
I would go with something with more capacity. I bought a 500 gram scale and find I have to do more frequent smaller batches because I can't double the mixes. Also go for one that can have it's auto-off function turned off - it's a learning curve to operate faster than the auto-off.
I don't have any experience with the one you're showing - but he's having to pick up a tool to operate the controls - that would be a pain .
I don't have any experience with the one you're showing - but he's having to pick up a tool to operate the controls - that would be a pain .
Martin
The following user(s) said Thank You: Michael Harrah
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- vector
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
- Life Is Good
Less
More
- Posts: 123
- Thank you received: 15
12 Oct 2012 13:14 #24792
by vector
Replied by vector on topic Digital Scales
Just an update...
I purchased the Jennings CJ-600(new) for what I consider a low price from the on line bidding site. This is a link summary from a vendor, I will post results when used.
www.oldwillknottscales.com/jennings-jscale-cj600.html
I purchased the Jennings CJ-600(new) for what I consider a low price from the on line bidding site. This is a link summary from a vendor, I will post results when used.
www.oldwillknottscales.com/jennings-jscale-cj600.html
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pam
-
- Offline
- Platinum Boarder
-
Less
More
- Posts: 4593
- Thank you received: 3706
12 Oct 2012 14:53 #24793
by pam
Replied by pam on topic Digital Scales
Two things I notice.. You will be making small batches of MMS - 600g is not a lot of weight, when you have the container also to weigh. I have a 1 quart glass saucepan that I use, and it weighs more than 600 grams, itself. The second is that I could not determine if there is an auto-off feature that can be enabled/disabled. This is crucial, IMHO.
Have fun, let us know how it turns out.
Have fun, let us know how it turns out.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- vector
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
- Life Is Good
Less
More
- Posts: 123
- Thank you received: 15
12 Oct 2012 15:43 #24795
by vector
Replied by vector on topic Digital Scales
There is a fine line between finances and desirability. The higher weight capacity machines(4000g) have a +/- tolerance of 1-2 grams(which I understand is not recommended) while a higher quality machine with tighter tolerance are much more expensive. I understand the concern with the low weight limit...but I should be able to circumnavigate the problem in hopefully one of two ways. The water could be either...(A). Weighed piece meal until the correct weight is reached or (
Not weighed but measured by volume via a measuring cup as water should have a known weight. The on/off feature is three minute limit but this unit has an optional 6-volt ac adapter that should disable the on/off timer(hopefully).
I know about "the best made plans of mice and men" but this is my thinking, or lack thereof depending on your point of view and or experience level. What do ya think?
I know about "the best made plans of mice and men" but this is my thinking, or lack thereof depending on your point of view and or experience level. What do ya think?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- vector
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
- Life Is Good
Less
More
- Posts: 123
- Thank you received: 15
12 Oct 2012 16:07 #24797
by vector
Replied by vector on topic Digital Scales
I didn't put the smiley face on my reply...not sure how it came to be.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pam
-
- Offline
- Platinum Boarder
-
Less
More
- Posts: 4593
- Thank you received: 3706
12 Oct 2012 16:12 #24798
by pam
Replied by pam on topic Digital Scales
Sometimes all we can do is experiment!
I say, go for it.
What I have found, in my experience, is that where the container being weighed sits on the platform will cause the weight to shift. When I start to make, I keep the container on the platform through the whole operation, as I've found that taking it off and putting it back is where I get a difference in weight.
What I have found, in my experience, is that where the container being weighed sits on the platform will cause the weight to shift. When I start to make, I keep the container on the platform through the whole operation, as I've found that taking it off and putting it back is where I get a difference in weight.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- vector
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
- Life Is Good
Less
More
- Posts: 123
- Thank you received: 15
12 Oct 2012 23:42 #24813
by vector
Replied by vector on topic Digital Scales
Pam...I searched and came up with this...what do you think?
Of course...the piece meal method will also be in effect till confirmation.
US Customary Volume Multiplier (exact) Metric Volume* Avoirdupois Weight Metric Weight
1 teaspoon N/A 4.929 mL 0.1734 oz 4.915 g
1 tablespoon = 3 tsp 14.79 mL 0.5201 oz 14.74 g
1 fluid ounce = 2 tbsp 29.57 mL 1.040 oz 29.49 g
1 cup = 8 fl oz 236.6 mL 8.321 oz 235.9 g
1 pint = 2 cup 473.2 mL 16.64 oz
(1.040 lb) 471.8 g
1 quart = 2 pt 0.9464 L 33.29 oz
(2.080 lb) 0.9436 kg
1 gallon = 4 qt 3.785 L 8.321 lb 3.775 kg
1 cubic inch N/A 16.39 mL 0.5764 oz 16.34 g
1 cubic foot = 1728 in3 28.32 L 62.25 lb 28.24 kg
1 cubic yard = 27 ft3 764.6 L 1681 lb 762.4 kg
Of course...the piece meal method will also be in effect till confirmation.
US Customary Volume Multiplier (exact) Metric Volume* Avoirdupois Weight Metric Weight
1 teaspoon N/A 4.929 mL 0.1734 oz 4.915 g
1 tablespoon = 3 tsp 14.79 mL 0.5201 oz 14.74 g
1 fluid ounce = 2 tbsp 29.57 mL 1.040 oz 29.49 g
1 cup = 8 fl oz 236.6 mL 8.321 oz 235.9 g
1 pint = 2 cup 473.2 mL 16.64 oz
(1.040 lb) 471.8 g
1 quart = 2 pt 0.9464 L 33.29 oz
(2.080 lb) 0.9436 kg
1 gallon = 4 qt 3.785 L 8.321 lb 3.775 kg
1 cubic inch N/A 16.39 mL 0.5764 oz 16.34 g
1 cubic foot = 1728 in3 28.32 L 62.25 lb 28.24 kg
1 cubic yard = 27 ft3 764.6 L 1681 lb 762.4 kg
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pam
-
- Offline
- Platinum Boarder
-
Less
More
- Posts: 4593
- Thank you received: 3706
13 Oct 2012 01:02 #24818
by pam
Replied by pam on topic Digital Scales
This is a nice chart. Steve is the expert, he has a great chart on his website for measures and weights, too.
keavyscorner.com/index.php?main_page=page&id=8&chapter=10
As I look at it, say you wanted to use a pint of water, you would get the weight of that, 471.8g and multiply that by 28%, which is 132.1g.
You would tare out a small glass container and measure out 132.1g of water, from your pint and set that aside.
Take another small glass container, tare it out and measure 132.1g of SC into it.
Then combine the water (which now is less than a pint) and the 132.1g of SC.
As I look at it, say you wanted to use a pint of water, you would get the weight of that, 471.8g and multiply that by 28%, which is 132.1g.
You would tare out a small glass container and measure out 132.1g of water, from your pint and set that aside.
Take another small glass container, tare it out and measure 132.1g of SC into it.
Then combine the water (which now is less than a pint) and the 132.1g of SC.
The following user(s) said Thank You: fourfingerz
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- vector
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
- Life Is Good
Less
More
- Posts: 123
- Thank you received: 15
13 Oct 2012 01:53 - 13 Oct 2012 02:04 #24822
by vector
Replied by vector on topic Digital Scales
Ok it late....so excuse my slow thinking. I measure water(weight) to mix with sodium chlorite. I find the volume of water in fluid ounces that I can measure in a standard measuring cup that will be converted to grams so I can use the scale you offered earlier.
Last edit: 13 Oct 2012 02:04 by vector. Reason: not thinking straight
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.356 seconds