TOPIC:

Is CDS just as effective as mms1? Scientifically it seems the end result to the body is chlorine dioxide for both methods.

I understand that it is both the same but CDS is easier to take for people who get nauseated by the smell of MMS1.
I have continued with the MMS1 because it doesn't worry me and is doing me good.

No they are not the same CDS is x3 powerful and doesn't cause the herzhimer effect (the throw up effect) tastes a whole lot better than mms. So no they are not the same. CDS is more effective.

Matt - CDS is so new that they're still finding out where it fits in the cornucopia of MMS treatments and protocols. It definitely seems better for some things than for others (really dynamite on skin problems) - It didn't cure the malaria on one of the malaria trips - but now they're thinking they should have used a different dosing - (At the time, the area was "ruled" by rebels who had to give permission for the guys to be there, and when they didn't have the results they expected right away, they were ejected fairly quickly, as I understand.) I've said before, "it's a moving target" - they are going to be finding out more about it as we use it, and if that worries you, or is frustrating, then I'd stay with the MMS.

I know a young woman with cancer who is slowly resolving her tumors with CDS. She takes a LOT of it - the equivalent of 12 drops of MMS every hour for 10-12 hours a day.

I'm not sure I would go so far as to say it's 3x stronger than MMS. With MMS, you have not only the chlorine dioxide, but also some hypochlorous acid and a few other byproducts of the mixing of the two ingredients (citric acid and sodium chlorite). The hypochlorous acid is also part of the MMS arsenal - it's what MMS2 is, and what the body uses in the immune system to kill pathogens. Plus, with MMS, you can have sodium chlorite that was not activated in the short activation period continue to activate in the body - (which is very hard to quantify) -

My feeling is that if you can do MMS, we've had over 10 years of experience with it, and it's where I'd go. If you can't (and I can't) then CDS is the next best alternative. Fortunately, JH has given us easy instructions for making a daily dose of CDS.

Pam, You seem more knowledgable than most on here so I will ask you my question. CDS is shrinking my prostrate cancerous tumor quite nicely and I expect it will dissappear in about a week. However I have a recurring bladder infection which is not being helped by the CDS. I have been on a 7 day cycle of Cipro Antibiotic to help with the UTI but as soon as the pills are gone the infection returns. That has happened twice now !!
Question: Is MMS Protocol1000 better for UTI than CDS ? I am taking half a teaspoon ( measured) CDS every half hour for my cancer ( 9 drops equivalent ) but it does nothing for my UTI.
Your thoughts please.

Many thanks,,,
Ted,,,

Hey Ted,I have answered you on this question already under urine infection. Have you not looked this up? Ecoli is 90% the main culprit for bladder infection. Anti biotics cannot get to the problem effectivaly but D-Mannose can. Ecoli hugs the bladder wall. D-Mannose is mixed with water and when it gets to the bladder it picks up the ecloi as the D-Mannose sugary/stickey solution adheres to the ecoli and takes it out with the urine. I have used D-Mannose so I know it works. Withen a couple of days I saw/felt the difference.
Maybe Pam has a different slant on this.
I would like to know more on your prostate cancer tumour useing CDS.

Hi, Ted. I don't know that I'm more knowledgeable than most, I'm just retired, so I'm on the forums more often.

The d-mannose is a good place to start - if that works, you're home free! My problem was more urethral irritation and irritable bowel - all of which affected my bladder, and made me think I had a bladder infection - and so the MMS skin spray actually worked for me, as long as I didn't let it go too long before I treated.

One thing you might consider - if the d-mannose does not work as you had wished, is doing the 1000+ protocol. MMS and DMSO - the bladder is a "deep tissue" area, and it's possible that the treatment you're doing is working so hard on the prostate issue, expending itself in the process, that you're not getting enough of the chlorine dioxide to the bladder to work.

Hi Pam,
It seems a lot is known about activated MMS, but not as much about MMS + DMSO and CDS + DMSO.

I treating Lyme I think it is crucial to use the extra delivery potential of the DMSO. I just do not know if it is worth trouble of making CDS or stick with the MMS.

I guess that is for me to find out by my experience.

For sure, there hasn't been a lot published on CDS and DMSO. There's been more on the MMS/DMSO (protocol 1000+)

If you are having no problems with the MMS, I'd stay with the protocol 1000+ or MMS1 and DMSO.
P