TOPIC:

Sorry, I dont like the word Sacrament instead of Protocol . Sacrament looks a bit out of place, but probably not so if you are religous.
Protocol is very self descriptive and says it all. Protocol 1000 is a protocol. Its really not a sacrament.
[A sacrament is a sacred rite recognized as of particular importance and significance.]
Its religous. This may turn a lot of people thinking we may be religous nuts. I just showed a friend sacrament 1000 and he poo haad it. Are they religous sect he said. And then didnt want to know anymore about it.
[Protocol is amongst other definitions, is a record of data or observations on a particular experiment or proceeding]
Protocol is much easier to read and understand.

My opinion, whats yours.

i think you're right , Woofy
Sacraments we have in the catholic church , protocol fits more to the MMS program

I can really understand, but I think this is one of those situations where those of us who have a knee jerk reaction to words like minister, church, healing waters and sacrament are probably going to have to suck up and overlook it. It helped me to say to myself - hey, that's MY reaction to word interpretations that I was taught in my early childhood. (Being raised Catholic, I got them all <G>) - After all, sacrament comes from sacred - and today, for me as an adult, there are many sacred things. I'm not going to let one particular church/political organization claim ownership of sacredness. But the older I get, the more mystical I get and this is just my opinion, I don't mean to offend those who feel otherwise, or suggest they should have different beliefs than those they have.

I think we all know why the church of health and healing was established - just from the legal standpoint - but also, I realized that in some of the countries Jim and his guys are working (as in S.America) - even the population is more accepting of a religious concept. My guess is that us westerners will be calling it Protocol 1000 for a while yet - at least until the next book comes out - As long as we all know what we're talking about, (and can translate back and forth ), we'll be ok. Sometimes I think of 1000 as the basic protocol, and 2000 as the life-threatening protocol. And like Californians call I-5 "the 5" - my guess is that some will be calling it "the 1000"

You will know your population, if you're working with others - and will meet them "where they are (starting from their paradigm)" - that requires flexibility - and flexibility is something we all have, or we wouldn't be here.

We need protection from the governments of the earth that don't want us to have control over our own health.

Freedom of religion has got the Catholic Church behind it. Think about how powerful they are. The governments leave them alone because of freedom of religion, which the populations believe in. We need to fall under that same umbrella of protection if we want to have any chance of standing up to the governments legally.

The medical/govn't/pharmaceutical mafia all understand how to play the legal games and use that against us to send their FDA goons after us to stop us. We have to get sophisticated and fight back on the same terms or we don't even stand a chance.

This is a fight/war we are in, for control over our own health. If we lose, they will have control over everything you can and can't do. I think Jim understands that and he is making some good decisions.

Michael

Archbishop Jim has done his research and has a good legal team behind him advising and if it has to be called sacrament than it is sacrament, I mean we already have accepted the word church even though it is not religious but goes on health, so what is wrong with sacrament...????

It is just a word as long as we all know what the sacrament is and it goes on health wheres the problem......