TOPIC:

Not too long ago, the FDA published an article that was quite untrue. They said the MMS was just industrial bleach, that it might cause much damage to people taking it, and that it is a poison.

That's the FDA contradicting itself

Chlorine dioxide is FDA-approved for sanitizing foods and at this time, if you have eaten food in the United States, chances are about 99% that they were processed with chlorine dioxide (that is, with activated MMS). Their approval is not contingent on the chlorine dioxide being washed off before the food is sold or eaten. If it was really a poison, why would the FDA have authorized its use on foods?

When making these statements, they depend on the public's ignorance of the facts and on their willingness to believe anything the FDA says. So I thought you might like to know the facts and figures involved instead of being fed falsehoods. Of course, we would all expect a wonderful governmental agency such as the FDA to tell only the truth to the public, but you decide:


What is the True Strength of an MMS Dose?

The FDA said that MMS was a 28% solution and thus an industrial bleach.

They and other critics always fail to mention the true strength of an MMS dose. They also fail to mention a simple high school chemistry fact, that "All substances are poisonous in large quantities."

Of course, we often buy products as strong solutions -- for example, dishwashing liquid and laundry bleach. But you don't use 100% laundry bleach on the clothes. You put a tablespoonful in a tub of water, greatly diluting it. And MMS is the same way. We put 3 drops of MMS in a half glass of water or juice and drink it that way. So instead of being 28% the drink is 0.00004% or 7,000 times weaker than the FDA would have you believe.

Of course they say this because they are trying to protect the income of their medical drug manufacturers. An effective remedy like MMS threatens those billions of dollars.


Is MMS Harmful to the Body?

The FDA said that MMS could harm the body.

But remember that MMS is not an acid -- it is an oxidizer and does not have the power of acids. This 0.00004% solution is extremely weak and diluted. It can easily penetrate the thin outer membrane of a pathogen (only one ten-thousandth of an inch), but the membranes around body parts and organs are thousands of time thicker.

Thus the diluted MMS cannot harm these body parts and organs. Also, nature has gone one step further than that. Nature has coated the entire insides of the body with a thin layer of mucus. Laboratory experiments have proven that the weak 0.00004% solution of MMS cannot even penetrate the mucus coating of the inside of the human body, much less penetrate the organ cell membranes beneath it. This mucus coating is generated by goblet cells and is refreshed throughout the body daily.

Although there are some MMS protocols that require more than 3 drops per dose, only malaria requires more than 10 drops. So that means that an MMS dose is seldom more than a 0.00008% mixture (unless you have malaria). So the fact is, that MMS does not do damage to the human body in 0.00008% mixtures and less. It cannot.

One can often have a Herxheimer reaction of nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea, and less often headaches and other pains, but these things cannot be the result of damage to the body. They are the result of overdosing yourself with MMS – killing more pathogens than your body can dispose of quickly. The dead pathogens dump poison into the body. In 12 years of MMS use, there has never been any evidence of damage to the body.

I hope this gives you a better understanding of the action of MMS in the human body.

My new Book, "The Master Mineral of the 3rd Millennium" is available as an EBook. Here are some of the topics covered:


· Safety precautions;

· What MMS is;

· Many new protocols for using MMS correctly;

· Protocols for many diseases;

· How to tell if MMS is working;

· MMS2; MMS3;

· Healing animals with MMS;

· Making MMS in your kitchen;

· A chemical explanation for laymen and scientists;

· Oxidizers and how oxidation destroys pathogens;

· MMS, ARVs, and vaccines;

· Methods of using MMS other than oral;

· The Mexican story, South African story, and Malawi story;

· The Genesis II Church of Health and Healing and our 180 Ministers of Health in 47 countries;

· MMS and drugs;

· And buying, using and teaching others to use MMS.

You can purchase the EBook at miraclemineral.org. (Get it now www.miraclemineral.org/newebook.php) The hardback copy will be available soon, (1-2 months).

Note: If you know the information in this book, you can treat more diseases successfully than any medical doctor, and more importantly you can save lives, perhaps your own!

As always with love,

Jim Humble

P.S.

My next MMS Seminars are May 9th-18th, June 20th-29th, (Dominican Republic). For more info., please contact us at: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Take the MMS Video course taught by me personally now at home and become a "Health Minister". (For more info about MMS Home Video Course, contact us at: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Please check out the Genesis II Church membership cards at: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
(For more info. about joining the Genesis II Church of Health and Healing, contact us at:This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
All other questions, please contact at:: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Here is what silverfox_science "Tom" chief pharma troll for MMS has to say in response. Precious little when you consider I am sure he called back to the pharma home office for help with a response. This is Tom's typical strategy to scare people with PPM numbers and make them fearful of 'industrial chemicals' that masses of people in Mexico and Africa don't have any trouble using to cure their diseases.

Unfortunately, Jim Humble and his group are not strong in math... or chemistry.

MMS at 28% by weight sodium chlorite is an industrial concentration that has dangers associated with handling it.

This is the same idea as 30% hydrogen peroxide being dangerous to handle.

You can go to the local store and pick up 3% hydrogen peroxide because that concentration is safer to handle. In the same way you can go to your local feed store and pick up a gallon of 2% sodium chlorite. At that concentration it is safer to handle.

If you use proper personal protective equipment and follow the safe handling procedures outlined in the MSDS for the particular chemical, you can safely handle and use industrial strength chemicals. When I purchased my MMS I received no MSDS, and had to look the information up on industrial web sites in order to find the safe handling instructions for this industrial strength chemical.

MMS is sodium chlorite. The concentration of sodium chlorite in MMS gives the solution a PH of around 12. A solution that has a PH of 12 is not an acid. However, the MMS protocol calls for activating the sodium chlorite, and chlorous acid is formed.

So, MMS, by itself, is not an acid, but when you follow the MMS protocol you are drinking chlorous acid that has a PH of about 3. This gets back to basic chemistry. A PH of 7 is neutral. When the PH is higher than 7, the solution is alkaline. When the PH falls below 7 the solution is an acid. Chlorous acid is also an oxidizing agent, and has a higher oxidation reduction potential than chlorine dioxide has. This gives it more power than chlorine dioxide.

I can believe that over the past 12 years Jim Humble has no evidence of harm to the body. However, in order to collect evidence, you need to do some tests. Since chlorous acid (what MMS forms just before you drink it) is an oxidizer, testing should be done to check the body for signs of oxidative stress. As long as those tests are not done, there will continue to be no evidence of any harm inside the body.

A 3 drop dose of MMS in half a glass of water has a concentration of a little over 0.03%. Rather than working in percentages, it is sometimes easier to just go by parts per million. A 3 drop dose of MMS in half a glass of water has a concentration of a little over 316 PPM (or 0.0316%). A 0.00004% dose would have a concentration of 0.4 PPM. To mix up this concentration you would put 1 drop of MMS into 33 liters of water.

For reference, cities that use chlorine dioxide for water purification us a concentration of 2 PPM.

There is some truth in the bulletin. The concentration of a substance determines its toxicity. The concentration used for a 3 drop dose following the MMS protocol is 158 times that which has been determined to be safe for water purification.

There is no evidence showing that these chemicals are safe beyond 5 PPM, and for a period of 12 weeks. We know that following the MMS protocol is not immediately lethal, but no testing has been done to determine the effects of oxidative stress and free radical build up in the body while following the MMS protocol. The theory of free radical damage suggests that one manifestation of oxidative damage is impaired cognitive function. Jim Humble says that he has been using MMS for over 12 years now. Has anyone compared his early videos to recent ones to see if there has been any change in his cognitive function? Perhaps the evidence of long term effects is staring us in the face...

Tom

I am so sick of these liars. I think Jim did a great job!

Michael

Tom

Please be advised that there are two totally balanced reactions when sodium chlorite is activated.

3 NaClO2 + C6H8O7 = 3 HClO2 + C6H5Na3O7

15 NaClO2 + 4 C6H8O7 = 12 ClO2 + 4 C6H5Na3O7 + 3 NaCl + 6 H2O


One is indeed that which produces chlorous acid and one chlorine dioxide with the associated by products. If you will research chlorous acid you will find that it is unstable and it is a liquid and the reaction with chlorine dioxide is most stable and is a gas.

So while it may seem illogical for a reaction yielding a gas to be more stable than one producing a liquid, that is what occurs. The reaction with the most stability is the one that prevails.

Check out the ph of the reaction. I think you will find it is not nearly as acidic as you have mentioned. I cannot get my reactions to attain the low ph that you mention. It should then be easier to conclude that you get chlorine dioxide not chlorous acid

Dr Ron

I have read this guy post a lot... he is acting to be good but it just a plain bad guy with intention that harm people.

You are absolutely right Edwin, silverfox_science is all over the net posing as some kind of 'authority' on MMS and always undermining its use. Below is a post one of my friends "Healinghope" posted in response to Tom.

Tom I am still amazed with your expertise and knowledge you have so much time to spend surfing the net to write of MMS. It also seems to me you have doubted Humble long before his "cognitive function" became impaired by MMS, according to your words. It amazes me when I google silverfox how many hits I get with you countering the writings of Humble. Perhaps this is your mission. Curious of your motive, humanitarian? Must be hard to put bread and butter on the table with all that time on the laptop.
curezone.com/forums/s.asp?f=762&c=0&ob=d&m=SilverFox
www.lymeneteurope.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=871&start=60
boardreader.com/thread/DMSO_and_MMS_transdermal_protocol_questi_5diqjXsm08.html

Here is what deceiving Tom said in response:

Hello Healinghope,

I believe my words were that Jim Humble appears to be experiencing some oxidative stress...

If you took some time and read the posts that I have made, you will find that I am actually an advocate of sodium chlorite, chlorine dioxide, and chlorous acid. I think they are great chemicals.

When Jim Humble stops lying about these chemicals, I will stop correcting his mis-information.

Tom

The first time I saw Tom call Jim a "liar" I knew he was a pharma whore paid troll. He always sounds rational and scientific, and then he starts calling Jim a "liar" and has no basis for doing so? That and other things prove he is working from a hidden agenda. The most reasonable explanation for his posts is that he is being paid by big pharma to carry out damage control against MMS. It is the only explanation for his rationality most of the time and then clear irrationality when it comes to Jim and his reports.

Tom is always trying to trick people into thinking he is only trying to be good and helpful. Novices and newbies don't see what he is doing. The effect is people who believe in MMS and are willing to try it for their diseases get discouraged by Tom and give up. He has caused MANY people to turn away from MMS who could have been cured. He is pure evil in my book, and I told him as much to his face in a group of 1,500+ members. He never once denied my repeated accusations that he was a paid troll. If you were being falsely accused repeatedly, wouldn't you at least deny the charges once?

Michael

I think we should invite him to see the black n white we are collecting it day by day in this forum and see if he could talk out something. Only time and proved can kill this guy mouth.... the day will come for him soon.... i am collecting every possible evident at my side and hopefully all who are using mms will also collect it and post it in this forum....

Here is Tom's response to Dr. Ron.

Hello Dr. Ron,

Here are the details of my observation.

I put 0.176 ml (3 drops) of MMS into a glass and add 0.176 ml of 50% citric acid. I let the solution activate, then add 100 ml of distilled water. The PH of my distilled water is 6.5.

After checking 3 points of calibration on my PH meter (PH 4, PH 7, and PH 10) I check the chlorous acid solution and find that it has a PH of 3.15.

The next step involves adding only chlorine dioxide to water and eliminating the chlorous acid.

Take 1 ml of 5% sodium chlorite and add 1 ml of 6% HCl. Add 100 ml of distilled water to this. Cover this solution, but allow tubing to both enter and exit the cover. Position the inlet tubing in the bottom of the beaker and the outflow tubing in the air space above the fluid level. The outflow is then directed to bubble through another beaker that has distilled water in it. Direct air to flow through the system. The air will bubble through the chlorous acid solution releasing chlorine dioxide from it. The chlorine dioxide will be deposited into the distilled water. Keep checking the latter solution and stop the process when the chlorine dioxide reaches a concentration of about 100 PPM. Check the PH of the water that has the 100 PPM chlorine dioxide concentration in it. Mine had a PH of 6.4.

As you can see, adding chlorine dioxide to water doesn't change the PH of the water. On the other hand chlorous acid is an acid.

Tom

Tom

If you are going to present your viewpoint and want to build credibility, at least compare apples and apples.

First please calculate your ph using the recommended amount of water for your dosage. You have used 100ml. Humbles protocol suggests half a glass that is at least 200 ml and more like 250ml. Most household glasses are 16 oz so one half is 8 oz or 250ml. Also with normal amount of daily water consumption each person is further diluting the ph and ppm. When using more water it will raise the ph and lower ppm.

Also use reactions that are stable, consistent and products that are stable. Chlorous acid is very unstable and chlorine dioxide is very water soluble. What you are getting in the reaction is chlorine dioxide gas emitted and being dissolved into the water when sodium chlorite is activated with citric acid.

15 NaClO2 + 4 C6H8O7 = 12 ClO2 + 4 C6H5Na3O7 + 3 NaCl + 6 H2O
sodium chlorite plus citric acid equals chlorine dioxide plus sodium citrate plus salt plus water

In the next example not only did you use less water you activated with hydrochloric acid. Jim does not suggest that mode of activation that I have seen.
In fact your liquid could not have been chlorous acid. When activating with HCl the reaction does not get chlorous acid at all.

5 NaClO2 + 4 HCl = 4 ClO2 + 5 NaCl + 2 H2O
sodium chlorite plus hydrochloric acid equals chlorine dioxide plus salt plus water

What recognized chemical equipment did you use to accurately assess your progressing concentration of the chlorine dioxide gas up to the reaching point of 100ppm?? In my mind gas is hard to test concentration unless you have some very expensive laboratory equipment. Who supplies you with this kind of equipment??

If you are trying to present accuracy then please use amounts of water and same activation procedures suggested in the humble material so you are most accurate. It will change the ph, the PPM and the products of the reaction.

The average reader may not see the differences. Please present readers with chemistry that is consistent and backed by true reactions.
Too little water will lower the ph and raise the ppm and using a different activator will not yield the same reaction or any chlorous acid.

dr ron

Folks this is getting really interesting and exciting. Due to all the encouragement resulting from Dr. Ron standing up to notorious pharma troll Tom, there was an incredible barrage of posts "outing" Tom over on that 1,800+ member yahoo group! Some of them are from people in my MMS group. I had to start my group back in June last year just to have a safe place away from Tom. And now we have this wonderful Genesis II Forum as well which is safe from trolls and available to help people in need. Anyway posting below for your edification some of the posts put in that other group due to Dr. Ron's encouragement. Thank you Dr. Ron!!!

This is me speaking to my group:

Okay, here are some of the best posts you guys posted over there in reference to pharma troll Tom. Bravo and thanks! Posting them here for those who don't follow that group. I think I'll post these on Genesis forum also because they will appreciate them. Keep up the good work dear friends!

Michael Harrah

---

Original Message

---

Hello Group.......

Some time ago I asked Tom for his qualifications to pass out advice in the use of MMS. I asked specifically for his major field of interest where he attended college, the degrees obtained, and his grade point average. He refused to answer any of these questions. There is a rumor around the internet that his major field of interest was structural engineering. If so, I can understand why he refused to answer any of these questions. As for his knowledge and expertise in the use of MMS is probably because he is being spoon fed by his employers in big pharma,........just an opinion. I dont know about anyone else in this group.......but I dont think Tom is qualified to give me any advice in the use of MMS.

okie918

---

Original Message

---

According to the post on PPM 15 drops would be 1,580 PPM. At 6 doses a day
that's 9,480 PPM. If I add in my daily bath and douches there is an additional
200 drops. I am actually taking more. I'm even adding the MMS2 at 400mg six
times a day. I have done 9 doses a day and that was too much for me. I only
weigh 100 pounds. I don't do hourly or even every two hour doses at the
quantity I am taking.

If the posted calculations are valid, I should be dead. I shouldn't be able to
have cognitive functioning. For me personally, nothing is further from the
truth. I was almost dead before MMS1. The doctors sent me home in March of
2010 with a definite fast approaching death diagnosis. Since MMS1 my brain
functioning is improving by the day. So is my vision, so is my circulation, I
can crack my knuckles after about 15 years, parts of my body are able to
function again. I am in control.

I am not suggesting that anyone follow my protocol. I have been doing this for
about six weeks now. It is tough. There are side effects. I also take
vitamins and anti-oxidants. Start slow with the MMS's. Don't make yourself too
sick or weak. If so, back off.

I haven't done the DMSO treatment yet, so I have no opinion or experience with
that protocol.

I don't follow the Budwig diet. I've been on a healthy diet my whole life. I
don't do the flax because that is too much diarrhea with the MMS's. It also
makes the refuse harder to identify. I drink coffee and the MMS's still work.
Coffee has more anti-oxidants in it than blueberries.

I am very optimistic that I am going to live. I had no idea how far gone I
was. I am still in shock about it.

I feel so much better that it is easy to take returning health for granted. I
have to remind myself on a daily basis how grateful I am for these wonderful
products and the loving caring people who are stepping up to the plate. I go to
bed at night thankful that I can actually feel my hands and feet. It makes me
cry to even think about it.

All I can say, is do whatever you feel is right for you and your condition. I
have pushed the envelope. I pushed the envelope to the limit because I
basically was so close to death that I could barely stand up.

My best wishes on your personal health journey.

Suzanne

---

Original Message

---

Being a genteel Southern lady, there are certain things a lady of my generation simply does not say, so I will quote a well known saying from my locale by the Bubbas, please pardon my French in quoting their crude saying:

"This ain't no pissing contest", Tom!

You are straining at gnats. You are comparing kumquats to kiwis, although both are fruits. You are either trying to boost your own self image, attempting to promote your field knowledge level above Jim Humble's, convince readers of your accuracy when you are using criteria that does not match up with what you are comparing which invalidates your statements, you are part of Big Pharma, being paid by them and./or government interests to create chaos and spread misinformation

(Are you? This is a request to know that, out in the open).

None of the above is appreciated by me, and probably not by a lot of other members. Although you are entitled to freedom of speech in the USA and I will defend to the death your right to do so, I will not bother reading anymore of your propoganda with your pointed agenda and misinformation.

You have not sung in the choir Tom. Jim Humble has seen first hand the thousands throughout the world, who have benefitted from this solution. You have not.

Where are the MMS weapons of mass destruction? Where are the thousands, hundreds, or even tens of deaths from using this solution that you allude to is poisonous? Again, there are 9 dead hospital patients in this state from being given contaminated nutritional IV's and that has created havoc nationwide.

As previously stated, I saw 2 of my family members die needlessly following the protocols of traditional medicine.

I choose an alternative route for myself and I use my constitutional right to determine, follow, and conclude that route without distraction or prevention from you, Big Pharma, FDA, or anyone else.

My family members signed a document called DNR (do not resusciate) and it instructed medical providers of the limits to which they were to go or not go to save my family members lives.

I believe I have that same right-type to determine what path I choose for my health well-being.

Have a good day everyone, do your homework (due diligence), and follow your own good common sense, and read whomever's rhetoric you choose with wisdom.

I do wish everyone the best in your personal health decisions, whatever they may be.

Ramona

---

Original Message

---

I'm so weary of these chemistry lessons from very obvious Humble bashers. I had Chemistry at Purdue University as a part of my Engineering and this is all pure drivel and is designed to do nothing but discredit Jim Humble whose work has helped many people to regain health. He has done nothing to deserve this pervasive attack.

Its apparent to me that this Group [including the So called Moderator] has been taken over by a form of Quack Watcher idiots who get paid to confuse the proletariat.

By the way, what ever happened to Barrett?

Moderator, you killed my well thought out and non-confrontational treatise on these idiots, so its apparent that YOU TOO are implicated.

I'm OUT OF HERE and I hope the decent people here see the sham and bail out too.

wm