Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
Welcome to MMS Forum!

We encourage new members to post a short introduction of themselves in this forum category. Get to know your fellow board members and their interests and skills. Please come and participate in educating people about the healing miracle that is MMS, and join the movement to make it available to the World!
  • Page:
  • 1

TOPIC:

CDS VERSUS MMS 10 Jul 2012 15:47 #19729

  • rsbackus
  • rsbackus's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Junior Member
  • Junior Member
  • Posts: 25
  • Thank you received: 8
In the recently emailed video about the Genesis II Church Outreach in Arhuaco, I see that in this wonderful expedition that CDS was used to a considerable extent.

That raises, again, the question of how can we decide when to use CDS versus MMS?

Has our Church reached conclusions about this question which we as Health Ministers can use to guide our ministrations to those in need?

Certainly, CDS is more palatable, but we also know that it lacks efficacy in some circumstances e.g. malaria treatment.

My simplistic understanding is that CDS is more reactive, and therefore best used topically; whereas, MMS, being, as Andreas said, a cloud reaction of longer duration - is more effective longer term and can therefore reach further into the body.

Clarification would certainly help all of us who hope to provide the best possible health benefits.

Sincerely,

Rev Richard Backus
The following user(s) said Thank You: gosherrygo

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Re: CDS VERSUS MMS 24 Aug 2012 03:10 #21780

  • Evanir
  • Evanir's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Elite Member
  • Elite Member
  • Posts: 194
  • Thank you received: 85
Rev Richard Backus wrote:

"In the recently emailed video about the Genesis II Church Outreach in Arhuaco, I see that in this wonderful expedition that CDS was used to a considerable extent.

That raises, again, the question of how can we decide when to use CDS versus MMS?

Has our Church reached conclusions about this question which we as Health Ministers can use to guide our ministrations to those in need?

Certainly, CDS is more palatable, but we also know that it lacks efficacy in some circumstances e.g. malaria treatment.

My simplistic understanding is that CDS is more reactive, and therefore best used topically; whereas, MMS, being, as Andreas said, a cloud reaction of longer duration - is more effective longer term and can therefore reach further into the body.

Clarification would certainly help all of us who hope to provide the best possible health benefits."

Sincerely,

Rev Richard Backus

MY QUESTION: if R. Backus, who was trained at Genesis ll Church is not sure when to use de CDS or MMS, how are we beginners going to know?

What is the conclusion so far from the ones taking both for longer periods of time or from observation?
Thank you,
Evanir

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Re: CDS VERSUS MMS 24 Aug 2012 03:13 #21781

  • Macaddict08
  • Macaddict08's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 543
  • Thank you received: 471
Evanir,

I use them BOTH the MMS & CDS together (3 drops MMS + 3 drops CDS) = 6 drops per hour, for 10 hours.

Get the best of both worlds !


:-)
The following user(s) said Thank You: jbnet, Evanir, jescola

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Last edit: by Macaddict08.
  • Page:
  • 1