Inside the article, C60 is recommended against graphene. But both are modified carbon layers (also called fullerenes).
How should it help if you want to live sugar-free and instead of sugar-cola you drink sugar-lemonade?
So instead of the modified carbon compound graphene one takes the modified carbon C60? That makes no sense to me. Apart from the fact that there are countless studies that C60 is toxic and can even penetrate the cell membrane and change the genetic material. I know the advertising promises of the sellers (double the lifespan etc.) and find this very questionable.
The rest of the things I think are not questionable. But the C60 there one should clarify first before one takes a graphene derivative to bind graphene. That would be like saying that heavy metals should be taken to bind heavy metals... Because how do you get rid of a graphene derivative by taking even more of it (just a different kind/sort)?
But I have read several times that a modified carbon derivative is supposed to bind or neutralize another modified carbon. I just don't understand how this is supposed to work, because whether it's C60 or the even purer ESS60, it's exactly one of the products we're supposed to be injected with. So the same as this Darpa hydrogel, graphene, graphene oxide, carbon nanotubes, graphite, etc.. C60 is just a different version of the same stuff.
Or is it just me that doesn't understand that?
