TOPIC:

This video answered some of the questions I had.

I have found a video  Here  that says around the 19 minute mark that CLO2 won't work against Graphene Oxide.
And it mentions what will work. NAC apparently works best.(see text below)
Here the the link if the above here doesn't work. 
rumble.com/vjfddf-la-quinta-columna-at-the-xxvii-humanitarian-conference-of-comusav-conuvive.html?mref=3bvu5&mc=7pzjf

This link includes an English text translation of the above Spanish video. 

truthcomestolight.com/on-the-connection-between-graphene-oxide-found-in-covid-vaccines-electromagnetic-fields-blood-clots-severe-covid-symptoms-how-to-remove-graphene-oxide-from-the-body/

A possible important excerpt from the link above:

"On the other hand, I have been asked about the efficacy of chlorine dioxide. That goes another way. What it does is to oxygenate the cell, it prepares it so that it is not easily destroyed by this toxicant. What glutathione would do is to provide the army with more numbers of soldiers in terms of glutathione to deal with toxins. What we have found, as I say, is that most of the treatments that have been with N-acetylcysteine or glutathione and even with other antioxidants such as astaxanthin, which is a powerful antioxidant, have been very favorable treatments for the patients".

Hmm, so CDS doesn't help against the graphene, but it supports to possibly strengthen the cells. An interesting video. Also the statement at the end of the video that SARS-CoV-2 is supposedly graphene is also very explosive and would support the "no virus" theory by Dr. Stefan Lanka that I already mentioned in my last post.

This also reminds me of the following (which of course could just be only coincidence). Because Covid-19 could also stand for this:

C ertification
O ff
V accination
I dentification
D ocumentation
-
1 A (A is the first letter in the alphabet - for Artificial)
9 I (I is the ninth letter in the alphabet - for Intelligence)

If we now continue with "Patent060606" and "ID2020", I think that many people feel overwhelmed, so I just wanted to mention the keywords at this point. That goes then also into the biblical with the mark of the beast and its number 666 etc.. Well, anyway...

But I also found something interesting regarding glutathione:

"If sulfur is missing, glutathione - our great fighter against free radicals - cannot do its job. Glutathione is considered one of the strongest antioxidants of all. Now, if the body can't make enough glutathione as a result of a sulfur deficiency, the person suffers from increased oxidative stress, and the immune system also takes a hard hit because it now has to work much harder."

Source (only in german): www.zentrum-der-gesundheit.de/ernaehrung/nahrungsergaenzung/msm/organischer-schwefel-msm-pi

So Organic Sulfur - Methylsulfonylmethane (MSM) would then help with detoxification of the graphene I suppose.

In Wikipedia (I know wikpedia is not the best source but well... at least sometimes it could be true) I read that even soot and carbon is a so called polycrystalline graphite. So when we breathe in car exhaust, we also take in a kind of graphite if I understand correctly?

Also there exists the following: "Highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) is a highly pure and ordered form of synthetic graphite."

Because I also read that this "Darpa Hydrogel" should be a kind of graphene derivat. That would make sense then. Also I assume that the manufacturing processes of graphene have been greatly optimized and simplified over time.

For interested readers who haven't heard of the subject yet, here is a summary link with many good videos to start on the subject (including also two 5G videos): diannemarshallreport.com/it-is-now-confirmed-the-jab-is-poisonous-its-not-a-vax/

But I am glad that the graphene topic is making the rounds very strongly right now. Unfortunately, it is still very much hushed up in Germany where I come from. Very few (so called) truthers report about it so far. Most talk about viruses, antigens, immunity to the virus, efficacy of an unresearched vaccine, unjustified government action, etc. But there are slowly more as it seems. I am very curious to see what else comes out on the subject.

WHAT IS GRAPHENE OXIDE? MAIN INGREDIENT IN PFIZER, ASTRAZENECA VIALS EXPLAINED BY MEDICAL EXPERT

www.bitchute.com/video/VpyeB7oiLLHP/

So one of my questions is, if the contents of the vials for the jabs contain 98 to 99% graphene oxide, is there any room left for the mRNA that produces the fake spike protiens in the body after injection?, 

TIA,
Jim

c60 , aka Bucky Balls, aka fullerine, attract and collect graphene oxide, virus, and all types of 'bad' stuff and hold for elimination rather than allowing continuous circulation.

www.sesres.com/blog/what-is-c60/

@paul

"c60 , aka Bucky Balls, aka fullerine, attract and collect graphene oxide, virus, and all types of 'bad' stuff and hold for elimination rather than allowing continuous circulation."

Hmm, the statement that another graphene derivative should collect and attract graphene is (I think) wrong. That would be like saying that heavy metals should be taken to bind heavy metals...

Because Graphene is a single layer (monolayer) of carbon atoms and C60 is just another modification of the chemical element carbon.

Here are two excerpts from Wikipedia:

"Fullerenes (singular: the fullerene) are hollow, closed molecules (often with high symmetry, e.g., Ih symmetry for C60) of carbon atoms arranged in pentagons and hexagons. They represent (along with diamond, graphite, lonsdaleite, chaoite, carbon nanotubes, and graphene) another modification of the chemical element carbon."

And;

"Fullerenes are closely related to graphene, a modification of carbon."

Source: de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fullerene#Struktur_und_Stabilit%C3%A4t

I do not want to deny that graphene and all its derivatives could also be used positively. But that the graphene oxide/Darpa hydrogel/C60 or any other graphene derivative should work against graphene is doubtful. Even the "even purer" version ESS60 is a graphene (or carbon) derivative if I understand it correctly. 

Because how do you get rid of a graphene derivative by taking even more of it (just a different kind/sort)? So instead of sugar-cola, you drink sugar-lemonade and think that you are reducing your sugar consumption that way? That makes no sense from my point of view. Or how would you explain that?

@JimH1954

I think it contains about 99.99% graphene and the rest is supposed to be RNA. So then cells from HEK-293, MRC-5, WI-38 or whatever. In other words, cells from aborted fetuses. Whether a spike protein is produced is a good question but since the vaccines are not what they pretend to be I think it could be a lie to divide society even more. But let's see what else comes out over time.

Because an effect of the whole would be the following; the "conspiracy theorists" tell the "normal people" first they will die, then about a spike protein which distributes itself, later the graphene topic comes out and then they tell again something else and so on. The "normal people" hear once this, then something else and believe the "conspiracy theorists" in the end then no more word.

But I think with time the truth will come out somehow. I think it is important that one understands that one should not consume this "great shot" under any circumstances.

;You might want to read Anna who cured her dog from vet treatment;Fifty-six years later, Buckminster's students have discovered
some amazing things about BuckyBalls. For one thing, they are among the world's
finest and most efficient antioxidants. The cage-like structure of carbon atoms
presented by the carbon "balls" serves to trap free-radicals by the boatload --- or
should I say "ball load"? --- and transport the toxins out of the body very
efficiently.
Research has indicated that BuckyBalls are efficient traps for other kinds of waste
and foreign matter, too --- bacteria, viruses, foreign nanotech, heavy metal ions,
what-have-you --- get enmeshed in or attached to the carbon matrix and flushed
out of the body.
Some initial studies with rats have shown that regular ingestion of high quality
Carbon - 60 suspended in olive oil almost doubled their lifespan.

@paul

I have also read the advertising promises of the various seller sites and consider the promises to be more than questionable. The whole thing is apparently a substance that still needs to be researched. So a kind of Reseach Chemical that is very controversial. Very similar to the vaccine somehow....

And just like the fullerenes that are apparently in the vaccines, C60 apparently seems to attack the cell membrane and can even change the DNA. Why would you take something like that? As a comparison, you can also consult the vaccine manufacturer's site and read how well the vaccine protects against Corona. Or read on the page of a meat seller whether meat is healthy. 

To recommend something like this to people although the substance is very controversial and refer to the positive advertising promises I find very questionable. 

Of course, there are apparently also some positive effects (or trials) but I do not take painkillers to fight pain because I know that one must eliminate the cause of the pain and not fight the effect. It may alleviate symptoms in this example, but in the long run it is exactly the substance that the authorities want to inject into us.

Here are a few excerpts that I find very concerning. I only had to search briefly to find these things:

In contrast to chemically--either covalently or noncovalently--modified fullerenes, some C60 derivatives can be highly toxic. Furthermore, under light exposure, C60 is an efficient singlet oxygen sensitizer.
Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18217343/

Further:

C60 has genotoxic activity resulting in breaks of the DNA strand as well as oxidative damages of DNA in a concentration-dependent manner. The basic mechanisms of its toxic effect are lipid peroxidation, oxidative stress dissemination, and genotoxicity
Source: www.hindawi.com/journals/omcl/2018/1261356/

And

Recently, it has been demonstrated in silico that C60 is capable of binding to and deforming DNA. This raises the possibility that C60 may interfere with DNA replication, transcription and repair. If this holds true in vivo, nano-C60 may have harmful effects in biological systems.

Source: microbiology.ubc.ca/sites/default/files/roles/drupal_ungrad/JEMI/9/9-68.pdf

Of course, everyone should be allowed to consume the substances they want. But to sell something like that to other people with advertising promises like "doubling the lifespan" (just because it once worked on rats) I think is very questionable. Also because of all the contradictions one can find. In addition, as I said, it has not really been researched. Why should I be a guinea pig for big pharma? Also that the 5G radiation interacts with carbons and all the other information, makes C60 for me rather a product that is not needed. But as I said; to each his own.