It seems that even Andreas Kalcker talked about graphene in an interview. If someone can find an English translation of the complete interview I would be grateful for the link. This is just a small section of the interview apparently.
Hm, she actually only discredits Ricardo Delgado's study and the origin of the sample. At ~1 hour and 47 minutes, she can't even pronounce chlorine dioxide or andreas kalcker's name correctly. So she doesn't seem to know MMS or CDS. That makes me somehow skeptical about her knowledge.
But further I don't understand how she explains the sudden magnetism? Did I miss the part in the video? Because she only went into the "normal" side effects but she have no other explanation for it...
And whether the vaccine consists now of graphene or some other patented fullerene (i.e. a similar carbon compound) would also be a good question. Because after all, when I specifically look for sugar, I'm not thinking of artificial sweeteners like aspartame, acesulfame-K, etc.. Because it can also be this Darpa hydrogel or other carbon nanotubes or even C60 or similar compounds. And they certainly look similar but slightly different under an light and electron microscope.
And if the so-called fact-checkers and official media have already taken up the graphene issue and denied it, I think there's something to it.
But of course, the whole thing can also be a hoax or a misdirection.
But even the masks contain graphene, which has been confirmed even by official sources.
And I mean you can't get your hands on the vaccines and the real ingredients are still unknown. This is for example a (German) website where one can ask the state or official agencies and then get an answer from the official authorities that is posted publicly. Here the Robert Koch Institute says that they still do not know what is contained in the vaccines and have not done their own research. But even if they had, I don't think I would trust them.
And when I look at who has already confirmed the graphene, I think that the video of Whitney Webb is somewhat questionable. She accuses these people of having no idea and interprets everything in her own way.
- Prof. Dr. Pablo Campra Madrid
- Prof. Dr. Nauk Dr. med. Enrico Edinger
- Biophysicist Andreas Kalcker
- Dr. José Luis Sevillano
Because if professors and doctors confirm the study and she refutes it, well... of course it have not to be correct and even professors make mistakes... like I said it could be a hoax... and she's maybe right that it doesn't have to be graphene, but as I said, there are other similar substances that aren't even considered from her. She sits there for 2 hours and tries to disprove something for which she also has no other explanation.
Because if you don't know what is contained in the vaccines, you can't talk about graphene, lipid nanoparticles or spike proteins. That's why I think (because of the occurring magnetism) the graphene (or other fullerne) topic is very appropriate.
But let's see what comes out over the next time. There will certainly be more people doing their research soon.
Hm, I remember that these polyethylene glycols (PEG) without graphene (or maybe with, who knows) I have also found in normal shower gels (which ironically were suitable for allergy sufferers) and have read that they are all carcinogenic. But it would make sense if people also shower and wash with these PEG substances (of which there are many) so that a kind of nanofilm is formed even on the skin and hair. I mean, the skin also breathes. If the skin can absorb less oxygen in this way and becomes more electrically conductive (by any carbon or graphene layers), this would speak for the agenda. So one should eat the graphene, drink it, inhale it, shower with it and let it inject into oneself... well... pretty sick...
Also, all the websites that are currently advertising this graphene derivative called C60 are extremely eye-catching to me at the moment. C60 is also a modified carbon compound just like graphene. And they all advertise that you can get rid of graphene, among other things. I find this very strange especially since all modified carbon compounds are supposed to be very toxic and all the sites advertise that it is super healthy...
Another question that arises in my mind; is DMSO more effective or MSM? Or is it maybe similar? Because DMSO produces MSM in our body and MSM then produces the needed glutathione, N-acetylcysteine, taurine, etc.. But which would be more effective or more useful? Does anyone have an explanation or a theory?
I would like to propose a theory that I have to remove the Graphene Dioxide from the body.
And that is by way of sound vibrations.
This was inspired to me from Spiderman 3. Watch this YT video on Venom's demise and how Spiderman used sound vibrations to pull the black goo from his body.
There is no doubt and question that sound vibrations can be and has been used for healing. I am currently do it now.
We know that Graphene Dioxide is attracted to frequency, so I believe if we can find the right frequency, the graphene will pull itself out of the body through the skin. Without damaging the skin or the tissues in the body. Skin and tissues can regenerate on their own, however, you cannot regenerate from death.
Disclaimer:These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. MMS (Master Mineral Solution) has not been FDA approved to diagnose, cure, mitigate, treat, or prevent any disease. Chlorine Dioxide is also called MMS throughout this website. License: Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.