TOPIC:

Hi Joanne
In relation to the booster shot, like everything else, they lied and kept moving the goal post. On this note alone, that proves their manipulation and evil intentions towards the people. 
About the booster, originally, they said like a flu shot every year, then they said booster are required after 6 months; then said 5 months and now they are talking about 4 months. tomorrow it will be 3 months like the UK.
When they asked them how many boosters, they said 'we do not know' but ordered 151 million vials -  about 7 boosters per person!
The world is f*$%&^

superdave wrote:

Hi Joanne
In relation to the booster shot, like everything else, they lied and kept moving the goal post. On this note alone, that proves their manipulation and evil intentions towards the people. 
About the booster, originally, they said like a flu shot every year, then they said booster are required after 6 months; then said 5 months and now they are talking about 4 months. tomorrow it will be 3 months like the UK.
When they asked them how many boosters, they said 'we do not know' but ordered 151 million vials -  about 7 boosters per person!
The world is f*$%&^

I know, it's the never ending story.   Did you see the interview from the UK with Sajid Javid talking to the NHS about how they felt about mandates for medical staff. 

A brave doctor spoke up and said how he had covid and has natural immunity.  He also added that vaccine immunity will wane even quicker with Omicron and said that it would get to the point where they'd have to have monthly boosters.  Javid replied that he'd consult the vaccine experts.  Are you kidding me????  You're disrespecting the doctors and nurses on the front line risking their lives and take the advice from a bunch of greedy bureaucrats in it to make money.  They must be salivating at the thought of monthly boosters.  Endless stream of money.  In fact that was the goal of big pharma, one to get indemnity from law suits and two to mandate vaccines for every man, woman and child so that they could have money on demand each and every year.  Never thought we'd be under pharmaceutical dictatorship.  One day they will have to answer for their crimes. 

Isn't it interesting how the pandemic is so deadly that we only vaccinate the richer countries that can afford the vaccines?  I guess they're not so worried about third world countries.  Just proves even more it's about the money.
 

 

Aw you poor thing.  You really are going over and above for the team.  Would be interesting to see.  If your unjabbed arm doesn't discharge the ooze with the patch then be curious to analyze what it could be if it appears only in the jabbed arm.  Thanks for keeping us updated with such depth and detail with your bloods.  Are your boosters 4 or 6 months?
 

I'm happy to do Protocol 'K' on both arms.  TBH it will probably been a little depressing if both arms end up excreting the yellow discharge .......

At present my boosters are every 6 months, but I place absolutely no confidence they will remain at that and have been told they will be in line with the CHO's recommendations.   Without going into too much detail about my employment, my mandate conditions are different from 95% of most people. I am bound by an internal direction.  There are a number of colleagues currently fighting in the courts, coming at it from a number of angles, not just one. 

***I can't edit my latest bloodwork update but below are my Troponin results.
                                                      
                                                                                                                       15/11/2021                    06/01/2022
hs - Troponin                              Not Tested                 Not Tested                   13 ng/L                           10ng/L

(**The 99th percentile for healthy population is 14 ng/L)

 

I'm happy to do Protocol 'K' on both arms.  TBH it will probably been a little depressing if both arms end up excreting the yellow discharge .......
At present my boosters are every 6 months, but I place absolutely no confidence they will remain at that and have been told they will be in line with the CHO's recommendations.   Without going into too much detail about my employment, my mandate conditions are different from 95% of most people. I am bound by an internal direction.  There are a number of colleagues currently fighting in the courts, coming at it from a number of angles, not just one. 

***I can't edit my latest bloodwork update but below are my Troponin results.
                                                      
                                                                                                                       15/11/2021                    06/01/2022
hs - Troponin                              Not Tested                 Not Tested                   13 ng/L                           10ng/L

(**The 99th percentile for healthy population is 14 ng/L)

I hope with your colleagues fighting through the courts they can make some head way.  If they win then it'll be a domino effect and you can ditch the stupid mandates.  Just takes one win then it opens the floodgates.

With the Troponin levels, how do you interpret them?  I've been looking at the literature and it's a little confusing.



 

 

I hope with your colleagues fighting through the courts they can make some head way.  If they win then it'll be a domino effect and you can ditch the stupid mandates.  Just takes one win then it opens the floodgates.

With the Troponin levels, how do you interpret them?  I've been looking at the literature and it's a little confusing.



 

I just add in Troponin now so I have baseline levels moving forward.   It was only about $20, so it's not a huge expense. 

My understanding is that it is an indicator of possible heart damage.  You could certainly argue that the time delay between getting my jab and my blood test was to great and my T levels would have probably dropped back to normal by then.  I've certainly had no chest pain symptoms so me getting this test is probably a mute point.  I have at times (in the past) had elevated levels of Creatine Kinase, but in my opinion its due to my training.   A way of clarifying whether an elevated CK result could be from possible cardiac damage is to get a Troponin test which should be elevated as well.  So an example would be:

1.   An elevated CK test + Elevated Troponin test = Indicator of possible cardiac damage. 

2.   An elevated CK test + Normal range Troponin test = CK elevation likely due to strenuous exercise regimen.

When you get blood test results for CK there is a paragraph that reads:

"A moderate elevation of the CK. It is likely to have arisen from skeletal muscle and is frequently seen in symptomatic patients on statin therapy, patients with severe thyroid disease, following recent strenuous exercise, etc. It would be exceptional for acute myocardial injury to produce an elevation of this degree. However if there is concern regarding possible myocardial injury in addition to skeletal muscle, then we would recommend contacting the laboratory to request urgent Troponin analysis unless already requested".
 

BD wrote:

 

I hope with your colleagues fighting through the courts they can make some head way.  If they win then it'll be a domino effect and you can ditch the stupid mandates.  Just takes one win then it opens the floodgates.

With the Troponin levels, how do you interpret them?  I've been looking at the literature and it's a little confusing.



 

I just add in Troponin now so I have baseline levels moving forward.   It was only about $20, so it's not a huge expense. 

My understanding is that it is an indicator of possible heart damage.  You could certainly argue that the time delay between getting my jab and my blood test was to great and my T levels would have probably dropped back to normal by then.  I've certainly had no chest pain symptoms so me getting this test is probably a mute point.  I have at times (in the past) had elevated levels of Creatine Kinase, but in my opinion its due to my training.   A way of clarifying whether an elevated CK result could be from possible cardiac damage is to get a Troponin test which should be elevated as well.  So an example would be:

1.   An elevated CK test + Elevated Troponin test = Indicator of possible cardiac damage. 

2.   An elevated CK test + Normal range Troponin test = CK elevation likely due to strenuous exercise regimen.

When you get blood test results for CK there is a paragraph that reads:

"A moderate elevation of the CK. It is likely to have arisen from skeletal muscle and is frequently seen in symptomatic patients on statin therapy, patients with severe thyroid disease, following recent strenuous exercise, etc. It would be exceptional for acute myocardial injury to produce an elevation of this degree. However if there is concern regarding possible myocardial injury in addition to skeletal muscle, then we would recommend contacting the laboratory to request urgent Troponin analysis unless already requested".
 
Got it.   So your Troponin levels are in the normal range even though your CK levels were elevated but I remember you saying it was due to the vigorous workout at that time so that means cardiac damage is unlikely.  Pretty sure if you had heart issues you'd know within yourself.

My aunty and cousin had heart issues after their jabs.  They both said they had irregular heart rhythms and felt that something was off.  My cousin had heavy chest pains.  My aunty after detoxing on and off for 8 weeks feels fine now.  Heart rhythm is normal now thank goodness.  She's out walking 5km a day so she's back to her normal self.  She wasn't able to walk that far after the second Pfizer dose for a while so for her to be where she is now, to me that's massive progress.

My cousin who took the J&J had the micro clots developing on his skin, irregular heart rhythm, headaches and chest pain. I told him when he's up to it he needs to lose weight and get in shape to protect his health and ensure he'll have the best outcome from future covid infections.

Update yesterday......the micro clots have completely gone with no more new ones developing, headaches are gone and no more chest pains or irregular heart rhythm and he's cleaned up his eating and is back in the gym and has lost weight!  He feels like himself again.  Prior to MMS he felt he'd never be normal again and that he'd damaged his body beyond repair but 6 weeks later and he's doing great.  It truly is miraculous, that's all I can say to describe it.  I felt his hopelessness thinking that he wouldn't be around to see his kids grow up but to hear him now, happy and thriving just makes my day. 

My nephew I hardly hear from now, only when I check in because he's fine.  Zero side effects after the 3 initial "under the weather" days following his J&J vaccine.  Nothing to report.  I only hear from him when he needs my help.  No news is good news

My other cousin got the first Pfizer dose yesterday and refuses MMS.  She feels unwell but I can't help her unless she wants the help.  Can't help everyone and just have to respect that.


 

Some strange things happening on this site.  Not sure if all my posts are making it through.

at the start they said the gates of hell had a 20b fortune now they say he has over 200b and apparently the uk has got to throw away boosters as not enough ppl taking it up.

jeffers wrote:

at the start they said the gates of hell had a 20b fortune now they say he has over 200b and apparently the uk has got to throw away boosters as not enough ppl taking it up.

Good on them for chucking out that crap!  Need to end this insanity.  Funny how Gates gives to charity and yet he makes more in return?  I'd call this "investing" rather than philanthropy.  These jerks create charities and give back to themselves.

Did you see that video in the UK of that doctor calling out Sajid Javid?  He was challenging him on natural immunity and that it wasn't feasible to have constant boosters.  He's how all doctors should operate within a code of ethics.  Logic seems to have gone out the window.