TOPIC:

Hi, I am a new fan of MMS. I just attended a seminar on MMS and I'd like to start using it right away on a member of my family who is suffering from cancer. He is 72 years old and has had chemo and radiotherapy a number of months ago. He is frail and weak. To be honest, I feel I don't know where to start and how much MMS to give him, and I just read the information about CDH and wonder if I should use that for him instead of starting off with the MMS? I would really appreciate any help anyone could give me on what to do, and how to begin. Thank you very much.

We have had the most experience (and most successes) with the MMS - if you have a concern that your relative might have an issue with taste then I would strongly suggest MMS and the baby bottle technique. www.michaelharrah.us/parasite-protocol/protocol/132-baby-bottle-method-adults

Hi TeresaMc,

I'm going to basically say what I said to Blessed1 earlier today for her family member.

It's best to try one of the MMS products that is least likely to cause adverse reactions such as nausea, diarrhea, etc., because if he experiences them right away, he may immediately quit because he might think it's bad for him. So for that, I would either recommend CDH or CDS with my personal 1st choice going to CDH because it's easier to make and it contains all of the ingredients of traditional MMS which may also play a role in helping the body to heal itself of cancer.

Then, he should start on a low dosage, like 1ml per hour and then gradually increase to higher and higher doses, day after day. This will help him ease into it and he'll have the least adverse reactions, if any. If there are any adverse reactions, go back down.

I would also recommend sweetening the doses with SweetLeaf brand liquid stevia which is available through Amazon. This will make taking either the CDH or CDS much more pleasant so he'll be more likely to continue.

Another thing that I'd like to recommend is a diet that doesn't feed the cancer. It doesn't do any good (or it does less good anyway) if on the one hand you work at eliminating the cancer and then on the other hand you feed it. As far as I know, all starchy foods should be eliminated from his diet and he should eat lots of greens and eggs and fish, chicken and other meats. NO SUGARS or anything that will turn into sugar, including juices.

I also would have him do colonics and enemas and the parasite protocol that Andreas has put together. He needs to help his immune system as much as possible and by doing these things he will be lightening it's burden so that it will be able to focus on eliminating the cancer he has.

That's my advice.

May you and your family be well,
Scott

Thank you Scott for the helpful advice. I'll start him on the CDH and see how he gets on. I've ordered SweetLeaf brand liquid stevia so that should be here shortly.
Thanks again.
Teresa

I wish to goodness that we had the same success rate with CDH and CDS as we have with MMS - but we don't, they're just too new. IMHO, for something as serious as cancer, I would want something that I knew had a success rate. I would only move to CDS or CDH if I could not do the MMS.

Thanks, I just sent info to my son-in-law that has the prostate cancer and gave him your post.
Glenda

Thank you for your post and recommendation. I have 1 small bottle of MMS (Chlorine Dioxide) and 1 small bottle of Citric Acid. For the MMS, how much would you recommend I give him hourly of these 2 combined, and how much water should I add to each dosage. Any other information I'd appreciate. Thank you.
Oops, sorry, you did send me the link already.

The problem I have with Classic MMS is the citric acid activator. CLO2 is CLO2 no matter which acid is used, but 4% HCL tastes so much better and I doubt anyone would have a negative reaction to HCL as some do to citric acid. I would also activate longer, 60 seconds vs 20 seconds as Kerri also recommends now.

Recall that the recent success with MMS killing malaria 100% in Uganda, citric acid was not used.

A 27 October 2013 email from Leo Koehof:

"Dear Charlotte, by my last trial in Uganda I used a composition from Sulfuric acid to activate MMS. The reason for that is, that Sulfuric acid is registered in Uganda to use for water cleaning within a chlorine dioxide product.

To be sure not involved in troubles when the government would find out what we were doing, I used this for my own safety.

When we gave about 40 malaria people the first day this activated MMS, I was very excited or it would work. We promised all of them so much. It would be a really shame when it wouldn't work.

So the next day when we did the second blood control, all of them were negative.

It is not to the activator, but the dose. The activator hasn't any benefit in the body. The dose were probably less for Dengue.

For malaria I give only one dose 18 drops.

Leo"

We do need more people testing CDH to see if it is as or more effective than Classic MMS. If we don't test, how will we know?

Pam does have a good point that traditional MMS is what we know has proven to work in the past and it may be the best way to go.

However we need to consider what else we know:
1. We know that 1ml of CDH contains 1 drop of MMS - none of the MMS is missing.
2. We know that 1ml of CDH contains 5 times more CLO2 than 1 drop of MMS which has been activated for 20 seconds.
3. We know that most people can take at least 2 to 3 times more CDH than traditional MMS without having nausea problems.
4. We know that being able to increase the dose is important to overcome some of the diseases.
5. We know that some people give up on MMS because of the nausea and diarrhea problem.
6. We know that when people experience nausea, we instruct them to slow down or even go backwards, reducing their dose to later try to go back up again.
7. We know that if people make themselves sick by taking too much MMS, that can slow their healing down.
8. We know that many people, and especially elderly people who are more likely to develop cancer, are deficient in the amount of HCl they have in their stomachs and so will not be able to do a very good job of activating the MMS within their own stomachs.

However we also have to consider what we don't know:
1. We don't know if part of what works in MMS is the unactivated sodium chlorite - maybe that's what helps people to get well and if that's the case, traditional MMS would be better.
2. We don't know how much activation continues to happen in the stomach of the individual.
3. We don't usually know if the person is deficient in HCl in their stomachs.
4. We don't know if CDH will work better than MMS and we'll never know if we don't give it a try.

Given what we know and don't know, I personally think it makes sense to give CDH a try.

Apparently Jim Humble thinks it makes sense too, otherwise he wouldn't have published the newsletter endorsing it or said the following about it:

1. Tastes better
2. Lot less stomach upset
3. Once made it does not need activation, lasts for weeks
4. Appears to have better results

Here's the link to the entire newsletter that Jim did on MMS:
g2cforum.org/index.php/list/genesis-ii-church-jim-humble-newsletters/27395-cdh-a-new-simpler-mms

Each person just needs to weigh the information and do what they think will be best for them or their loved ones.

Recently, Mart1n has had some success in dissolving a cancerous cyst using CDH. You can read about that here:
g2cforum.org/index.php/list/general-discussion/27308-my-mms-cds-and-dmso-protocol

May you all be well,
Scott