- Posts: 106
- Thank you received: 100
MMS Not Killing My Cancer After 7 Months
- JTF
-
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
Let's check the science...
All studies (pooled effects, all stages)
Ivermectin has an efficacy rate of 62% based on 95 studies
For comparison
Quercetin has an efficacy rate of 50% based on 10 studies
Fluvoxamine --> 40% / 15 studies
Paxlovid --> 34% / 28 studies - Recommended for CV19 treatment
Budesonide --> 31% / 11 studies
Hydroxychloroquine --> 25% / 387 Studies
Remdesivir --> 11% / 52 studies - Approved for hospital CV19 treatment
Ivermectin
Early Treatment 62% from 37 studies (Hydroxychloroquine also has a 62% effectiveness as an early treatment)
Prophylaxis 82% from 17 studies
Only three interventions rank higher than Ivermectin (pooled effects, all stages) but all three have limited data (1, 4, and 4 studies respectively). Basic math dictates that 62% would provide a real world efficacy much greater than a very small group as incorrectly stated. Trust the science...or maybe start by reading it.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- DavidB
-
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
- Posts: 34
- Thank you received: 10
When I last saw him he was in the final stages of cancer and extremely ill, so - as I wrote before - nothing was going to work at that stage.
I didn't mention before that he had been double vaxxed with Pfizer just weeks before the cancer was diagnosed. Aggressive cancers are being increasingly diagnosed in the recently vaxxed. His cancer was in the lung - I was advised by an oncologist that lung cancers are usually quite slow to gestate - not rapid like this.
I really don't know whether he was herxing '- it may have been symptomatic of the final stages of cancer.
The viral theory of cancer is just that - an unproven theory - although I don't dismiss it.
I am very surprised that someone with your contempt for what you regard as bullshit would serious entertain Wikipedia. Wikipedia has been abused by "fact-checkers" to the extent that it is now corrupted through and through with BS. Example - the article claims Laetrile (AKA Amygdalin) is capable of causing cyanide poisoning - GASP GASP. This is utter bullshit. What they won't say is that vitamin B12 also contains cyanide - hence its name cyano-cobalamin and it is absolutely necessary for human health. The idiots who wrote this scare-mongering trash have no understanding of basic chemistry where otherwise poisonous substances change their characteristics completely when combined with other elements in molecular structures. Sodium and chlorine - both poisonous in their elemental forms, combine in ionic form as salt - another essential substance for biological health.
After Dr Sugiura at Sloan Kettering concluded that Laetrile is effective against cancer, there was a powerful campaign to discredit it - after all - the cancer industry based as it is on poisonous chemotherapy cannot afford to lose their billions in revenues to a simple common substance available to everyone.
And that is why Bill, that MMS and its proponents are now under the same vicious attacks as Laetrile suffered in the 1980's and 1990's. They were so successful that Laetrile is hardly heard of anymore.
MMS will probably suffer that same fate.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- JTF
-
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 106
- Thank you received: 100
FYI, the 387 studies used to collate the effectiveness of Hydroxychloroquine, including those that were inherently flawed by extreme overdosing which is not enough to disregard the scientific process, were used in the calculations.
Maybe instead of being presumptuous, you should spend time in the scientific repositories. I have made this suggestion several times.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- DavidB
-
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
- Posts: 34
- Thank you received: 10
The person who initiated this topic is obviously in dire need of help.
Surely it is our role as contributors to this post to help him/her instead of attacking each other.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- comfomania
-
- Offline
- New Member
-
- Posts: 1
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- TryingMyBest
-
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
- Posts: 22
- Thank you received: 2
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- stu77000
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 580
- Thank you received: 433
TryingMyBest post=78417this is so discouraging. I have same thing as original poster and have pretty much taken same path. Now using MMS for 3 months. No progress so far. So deflating.
What MMS1 dose are you on?
How many times a day are you taking it?
Is your diet correct. If not then you can be neutralizing the effects of the chlorine dioxide.
CDS might be an option, once you have tried higher doses of MMS1.
Next step after that would be MMS2 as detailed in Jim's MMS Health Recovery Guidebook.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- JTF
-
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 106
- Thank you received: 100
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- TryingMyBest
-
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
- Posts: 22
- Thank you received: 2
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- TryingMyBest
-
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
- Posts: 22
- Thank you received: 2
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.