- Posts: 173
- Thank you received: 235
MMS and Parkinsons Disease
- BobJ
-
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
Less
More
25 Dec 2019 20:59 - 25 Dec 2019 21:08 #62008
by BobJ
Replied by BobJ on topic MMS and Parkinsons Disease
Hello Martin;
I say 90% recovery because of our food supply; I can never stop taking CD, there is never a 100% perfect fix.
Whenever I feel pain in my joints or back; I up my intake of CD.
It was 21 days, 8 times a day, and then the maintenance dose of one in the morning and one in the evening. One time I stopped taking it for a couple of weeks and the symptons I had before slowly begin to creep back.
I am not even aware they creep back, I just think I have not taken it for a while, I will do a maintenance dose of 2 in the morning and 2 in the evening. The next few days those very minor aches and pains are gone, clarity and sense of well being return. I remember talking to my brother about my experience with CD after taking it for three months, I was getting better and better, every week. I questioned, how can this be possible?
This EPA study of "Glyphosate removal from drinking water" completed in 1993 from the link below.
cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_record_report.cfm?Lab=NRMRL&dirEntryId=129919
They wanted to see which method below was the best for removing glyphosate from drinking water.
Activated-carbon, oxidation, conventional-treatment, filtration, and membrane studies are conducted to determine which process is best suited to remove the herbicide glyphosate from potable water
The last sentence in their description;
"The oxidation results indicate that glyphosate is easily destroyed by chlorine and ozone. Chlorine dioxide, permanganate, and hydrogen pereoxide are less successful. These conventional-treatment and adsorption results are confirmed by pilot-scle studies."
It appears only oxidation methods work to remove glyphosate.
They are speaking in the context of wide scale glyphosate removal from our drinking water.
How did chlorine do in this study?
99% removal after 5 seconds
Complete removal after 10 minutes
What did they mean by less successful?
How did chlorine dioxide do?
28% of glyphosate removal initially (Drop from 739 to 590)
56% of glyphosate removal after 9 hours
So I would say, from this study held in the EPA's library, it appears that chlorine dioxide is successful at destroying glyphosate, but not at the same swiftness and totality of chlorine, which they require for wide sale removal of glyphosate from our water supply
The results are here page 22/39 on pdf page number, or page 16 on the bottom of the actual page
No need to read the whole thing just the summary in the last paragraph of 3.2.4 Clorination
Read the two paragraphs in 3.2.5 Chlorine dioxide
www.egeis.org/cd-info/WRC-report-UC7374-July-2007-Removal-of-glyphosate-and-AMPA-by-water-treatment.pdf
It is good to read and to question; and gather more references
I say 90% recovery because of our food supply; I can never stop taking CD, there is never a 100% perfect fix.
Whenever I feel pain in my joints or back; I up my intake of CD.
It was 21 days, 8 times a day, and then the maintenance dose of one in the morning and one in the evening. One time I stopped taking it for a couple of weeks and the symptons I had before slowly begin to creep back.
I am not even aware they creep back, I just think I have not taken it for a while, I will do a maintenance dose of 2 in the morning and 2 in the evening. The next few days those very minor aches and pains are gone, clarity and sense of well being return. I remember talking to my brother about my experience with CD after taking it for three months, I was getting better and better, every week. I questioned, how can this be possible?
This EPA study of "Glyphosate removal from drinking water" completed in 1993 from the link below.
cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_record_report.cfm?Lab=NRMRL&dirEntryId=129919
They wanted to see which method below was the best for removing glyphosate from drinking water.
Activated-carbon, oxidation, conventional-treatment, filtration, and membrane studies are conducted to determine which process is best suited to remove the herbicide glyphosate from potable water
The last sentence in their description;
"The oxidation results indicate that glyphosate is easily destroyed by chlorine and ozone. Chlorine dioxide, permanganate, and hydrogen pereoxide are less successful. These conventional-treatment and adsorption results are confirmed by pilot-scle studies."
It appears only oxidation methods work to remove glyphosate.
They are speaking in the context of wide scale glyphosate removal from our drinking water.
How did chlorine do in this study?
99% removal after 5 seconds
Complete removal after 10 minutes
What did they mean by less successful?
How did chlorine dioxide do?
28% of glyphosate removal initially (Drop from 739 to 590)
56% of glyphosate removal after 9 hours
So I would say, from this study held in the EPA's library, it appears that chlorine dioxide is successful at destroying glyphosate, but not at the same swiftness and totality of chlorine, which they require for wide sale removal of glyphosate from our water supply
The results are here page 22/39 on pdf page number, or page 16 on the bottom of the actual page
No need to read the whole thing just the summary in the last paragraph of 3.2.4 Clorination
Read the two paragraphs in 3.2.5 Chlorine dioxide
www.egeis.org/cd-info/WRC-report-UC7374-July-2007-Removal-of-glyphosate-and-AMPA-by-water-treatment.pdf
It is good to read and to question; and gather more references
Last edit: 25 Dec 2019 21:08 by BobJ.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Truthquester, CLO2, mart1n
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mart1n
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 450
- Thank you received: 385
26 Dec 2019 19:56 #62011
by mart1n
Very good! It may then be as simple as using some more CD, for some more time, in order to break down glyphosate as well as for example ozone.
From the Parkinsons testimonial at Neomed, we hear that Scott had great benefit from ozone treatment.
He also did enemas with ozone if I recall correctly. This correlates with what you have been doing and your results.
Replied by mart1n on topic MMS and Parkinsons Disease
BobJ wrote: 28% of glyphosate removal initially (Drop from 739 to 590)
56% of glyphosate removal after 9 hours
So I would say, from this study held in the EPA's library, it appears that chlorine dioxide is successful at destroying glyphosate,
Very good! It may then be as simple as using some more CD, for some more time, in order to break down glyphosate as well as for example ozone.
From the Parkinsons testimonial at Neomed, we hear that Scott had great benefit from ozone treatment.
He also did enemas with ozone if I recall correctly. This correlates with what you have been doing and your results.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Truthquester
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
30 Dec 2019 06:50 - 30 Dec 2019 06:51 #62026
by Truthquester
I'm Scott McRae, creator of "The Antidote" & CDH with CLO2's help (Charlotte Lackney)
- I did a CDH injection / Chlorine Dioxide (CLO2) injection / IV push of 10ml of dilute 50ppm CDH / CLO2 into my blood 3 times in 11 hours & did before & after blood tests that showed that it did NO HARM to my blood, liver or kidneys. This suggests the possibility that CDH / CLO2 is a potential LIFESAVING MRSA cure, VRE cure, CRE cure, AMR cure, Ebola cure, HIV cure, Cancer cure, etc., since it appears to be safe intravenously at 50ppm.
- Join our group on MiWi (was deleted off of Facebook): mewe.com/join/coronavirusebolasolutions
- Every ml of CDH contains 1 drop of MMS, so 1 drop of MMS = 1ml of CDH
- MMS is 7 to 10% activated in 30 seconds while CDH made with 4% HCl is about 50% activated in the bottle. This is why CDH is far less nauseating than MMS drops
Replied by Truthquester on topic MMS and Parkinsons Disease
Hi Bob, thanks for all the great info you're providing.
You wrote:
"How did chlorine dioxide do?
28% of glyphosate removal initially (Drop from 739 to 590)
56% of glyphosate removal after 9 hours
So I would say, from this study held in the EPA's library, it appears that chlorine dioxide is successful at destroying glyphosate, but not at the same swiftness and totality of chlorine, which they require for wide sale removal of glyphosate from our water supply"
In the study cited, they mention that the glyphosate concentration was unrealistically high and to put a number to that, it appears that it's from at least 70 to around 700 times higher than the other concentrations of glyphosate treated in the studies cited in the paper (compare 739 ug/L in the Speth study to 0.05 to 11.0 ug/L in the two other studies). In addition, note that they only used 1.07mg/L of chlorine dioxide which is equivalent to 1.07ppm within the liter after dilution (and about the amount of chlorine dioxide in about 1/6th of a drop of MMS). So in short, there was not near enough chlorine dioxide available to properly oxidize that extreme amount of glyphosate fully.
The bottom line though is that it appears that if chlorine dioxide can do as well as shown in this faulted study, at realistic concentrations chlorine dioxide should be able to virtually remove ALL glyphosate, or pretty close to it anyway. And this is FANTASTIC NEWS!
Thanks again,
Scott
You wrote:
"How did chlorine dioxide do?
28% of glyphosate removal initially (Drop from 739 to 590)
56% of glyphosate removal after 9 hours
So I would say, from this study held in the EPA's library, it appears that chlorine dioxide is successful at destroying glyphosate, but not at the same swiftness and totality of chlorine, which they require for wide sale removal of glyphosate from our water supply"
In the study cited, they mention that the glyphosate concentration was unrealistically high and to put a number to that, it appears that it's from at least 70 to around 700 times higher than the other concentrations of glyphosate treated in the studies cited in the paper (compare 739 ug/L in the Speth study to 0.05 to 11.0 ug/L in the two other studies). In addition, note that they only used 1.07mg/L of chlorine dioxide which is equivalent to 1.07ppm within the liter after dilution (and about the amount of chlorine dioxide in about 1/6th of a drop of MMS). So in short, there was not near enough chlorine dioxide available to properly oxidize that extreme amount of glyphosate fully.
The bottom line though is that it appears that if chlorine dioxide can do as well as shown in this faulted study, at realistic concentrations chlorine dioxide should be able to virtually remove ALL glyphosate, or pretty close to it anyway. And this is FANTASTIC NEWS!
Thanks again,
Scott
I'm Scott McRae, creator of "The Antidote" & CDH with CLO2's help (Charlotte Lackney)
- I did a CDH injection / Chlorine Dioxide (CLO2) injection / IV push of 10ml of dilute 50ppm CDH / CLO2 into my blood 3 times in 11 hours & did before & after blood tests that showed that it did NO HARM to my blood, liver or kidneys. This suggests the possibility that CDH / CLO2 is a potential LIFESAVING MRSA cure, VRE cure, CRE cure, AMR cure, Ebola cure, HIV cure, Cancer cure, etc., since it appears to be safe intravenously at 50ppm.
- Join our group on MiWi (was deleted off of Facebook): mewe.com/join/coronavirusebolasolutions
- Every ml of CDH contains 1 drop of MMS, so 1 drop of MMS = 1ml of CDH
- MMS is 7 to 10% activated in 30 seconds while CDH made with 4% HCl is about 50% activated in the bottle. This is why CDH is far less nauseating than MMS drops
Last edit: 30 Dec 2019 06:51 by Truthquester.
The following user(s) said Thank You: CLO2
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- BobJ
-
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 173
- Thank you received: 235
30 Dec 2019 10:08 - 30 Dec 2019 10:35 #62027
by BobJ
Replied by BobJ on topic MMS and Parkinsons Disease
Hello Scott;
Your welcome.
I observed what you saw, that in the study cited, they mention that the glyphosate concentration was unrealistically high, I really did not know how to interpret that. It seems like you have more of a scientific background to research that; the math behind it. However, in any case CD helps to close the tight cellular junctions, incrementally, by eliminating the glyphosate. It reduces the leaky gut to the person suffering from celiac disease. A person with gluten intolerance (celiac disease) they have a piece of bread, then the gut lining and the brain barrier opens up, and leaks; giving them brain fog for days.
I had 90% of the symptoms of parkinsons, leaking gut, same as the autistic child, toxins released from a dysfunctional microbiome, (over growth of pathogens and parasites releasing toxins), glyphosates side effect, much like alcohol, allows this leaking into my brain. I improved; so it must have reduced the glyphosate level in my body, also Kerri Rivieras results and the children that have recovered from autism support this.
Your welcome.
I observed what you saw, that in the study cited, they mention that the glyphosate concentration was unrealistically high, I really did not know how to interpret that. It seems like you have more of a scientific background to research that; the math behind it. However, in any case CD helps to close the tight cellular junctions, incrementally, by eliminating the glyphosate. It reduces the leaky gut to the person suffering from celiac disease. A person with gluten intolerance (celiac disease) they have a piece of bread, then the gut lining and the brain barrier opens up, and leaks; giving them brain fog for days.
I had 90% of the symptoms of parkinsons, leaking gut, same as the autistic child, toxins released from a dysfunctional microbiome, (over growth of pathogens and parasites releasing toxins), glyphosates side effect, much like alcohol, allows this leaking into my brain. I improved; so it must have reduced the glyphosate level in my body, also Kerri Rivieras results and the children that have recovered from autism support this.
Last edit: 30 Dec 2019 10:35 by BobJ.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Truthquester, CLO2
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Truthquester
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
02 Jan 2020 05:04 #62052
by Truthquester
I'm Scott McRae, creator of "The Antidote" & CDH with CLO2's help (Charlotte Lackney)
- I did a CDH injection / Chlorine Dioxide (CLO2) injection / IV push of 10ml of dilute 50ppm CDH / CLO2 into my blood 3 times in 11 hours & did before & after blood tests that showed that it did NO HARM to my blood, liver or kidneys. This suggests the possibility that CDH / CLO2 is a potential LIFESAVING MRSA cure, VRE cure, CRE cure, AMR cure, Ebola cure, HIV cure, Cancer cure, etc., since it appears to be safe intravenously at 50ppm.
- Join our group on MiWi (was deleted off of Facebook): mewe.com/join/coronavirusebolasolutions
- Every ml of CDH contains 1 drop of MMS, so 1 drop of MMS = 1ml of CDH
- MMS is 7 to 10% activated in 30 seconds while CDH made with 4% HCl is about 50% activated in the bottle. This is why CDH is far less nauseating than MMS drops
Replied by Truthquester on topic MMS and Parkinsons Disease
In the following video Kerri Rivera talks with a doctor who explains that chlorine dioxide breaks down glyphosate:
Take care,
Scott
Take care,
Scott
I'm Scott McRae, creator of "The Antidote" & CDH with CLO2's help (Charlotte Lackney)
- I did a CDH injection / Chlorine Dioxide (CLO2) injection / IV push of 10ml of dilute 50ppm CDH / CLO2 into my blood 3 times in 11 hours & did before & after blood tests that showed that it did NO HARM to my blood, liver or kidneys. This suggests the possibility that CDH / CLO2 is a potential LIFESAVING MRSA cure, VRE cure, CRE cure, AMR cure, Ebola cure, HIV cure, Cancer cure, etc., since it appears to be safe intravenously at 50ppm.
- Join our group on MiWi (was deleted off of Facebook): mewe.com/join/coronavirusebolasolutions
- Every ml of CDH contains 1 drop of MMS, so 1 drop of MMS = 1ml of CDH
- MMS is 7 to 10% activated in 30 seconds while CDH made with 4% HCl is about 50% activated in the bottle. This is why CDH is far less nauseating than MMS drops
The following user(s) said Thank You: CLO2, mart1n, BobJ
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.286 seconds