MMS and Heavy Metals

Hi All,
We know that positive⁺ attract negative^-, and that MMS is positively charged , Pathogens are negatively charged, so MMS get to the Pathogens and oxidize/kill them.
Now :
Heavy metals are positively charged, And MMS also positively charged.
Question:
How 2 positively charged can attract each other in this case? and how MMS neutralize heavy metals (that both are positively charged)?

Anyone logical input and explanation is appreciated.

~ Peace~

This may be a question for a chemist - like Tomas - Jim Humble doesn't tell us HOW it does it, he only states in his book that they saw the results of it happening in hair tests.

~ Anyone knows how it is done ??

Yes Pam, i read that too. Even in the recent conference in Europe they mentioned that it neutralize heavy metals (without explaining how)
We know how MMS deal with pathogens and its explained in the book
but we don't know how MMS neutralize heavy metals. (it is good to know HOW its done instead of only repeating what its written.)
any chemist? hope anyone can share knowledge.

~ Peace ~

Any forum member or any (chemist) know how this is done?

part of it is that it oxidizes the metals,

andreas kalcker cover this, pure zinc in the body is quite deadly, zinc oxide is harmless (or beneficial)


now the above is quite true/accurate

but we can speculate that removal of elements, when they are oxidized (and become harmless) is quite easy, think about fukushima and what they are doing, removing fuel cells...

versus working at a normal landfill....

its slow and go at fukushima, everything is deadly...

its business as usual at the local dump... "throw that stuff anywhere"

(again this is my own speculation, but the body is quite self protective)

I watched andreas's presentation, he mentioned the "Oxidation" word, but he did not explain How the mechanism of 2 positively charged (i.e MMS and metals ) take place.

As i mentioned MMS is positively charged and metals are positively charged. We know postive attract negative and vice versa.
But here we have 2 positively charged issue.

I hope someone in this forum explain it in a logical practical way.

mms is negatively charged and pathogens are positive .

Actually most of the serious bacteria are gram negative.

But MMS seems to work on Lyme bacteria which is gram positive. I think there is more to this MMS riddle than we yet know.

from andreas kalckers site


www.andreaskalcker.com/index.php/en/health/clo2-chlorine-dioxide

"Oxidation of Heavy Metals

Chlorine Dioxide oxidizes the heavy metals in the body. I think so because there have been a number of Hair analyzes where the roots of a person's hair were tested before and after taking Chlorine Dioxide. About two weeks later, there was no heavy metals, including mercury, lead and others. The analysis of hair roots is a good indication of the absence or presence of heavy metals. The oxidation of heavy metals is not the same as chelating, but the results are the same. When a heavy metal is oxidized, it is simply neutralized and than eliminated from the body . It is even able to remove mercury from our body because it`s oxidative potential is less than the ClO2."

Arrow wrote: Actually most of the serious bacteria are gram negative.

But MMS seems to work on Lyme bacteria which is gram positive. I think there is more to this MMS riddle than we yet know.

part of what it does is stimulate mitochondrial function, reports of people losing weight (fat) when not trying to, when they started MMS (that is from increased metabolism, from mitochondrial function)

but, aside from weight loss, all cells have a mitochondria (including immune cells), and in 1 of the videos by andreas kalcker, he states "we saw immune cells (I think he said leukocytes, but I am unsure), and they were moving at 10 times their normal rate, after the person took MMS"

meaning they are 10 times as active...

imagine an immune response that was 10 times the normal persons?

that is part of the mystery, right there....