Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
For more MMS Testimonials: mmstestimonials.is
  • Page:
  • 1

TOPIC:

CDS or MMS in protocol 2000 18 Apr 2013 11:44 #32623

  • Vitalii
  • Vitalii's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Posts: 4
  • Thank you received: 0
Hello! In advance I apologize for my english)))
My problem is, my father was diagnosed with cancer of the lung. 4 degree. I started giving him the MMS protocol 2000 MMS2. Once we have reached a level of 5 drops per hour, he had diarrhea. We reduced the dosage. Diarrhea has passed. I read in a book about MMS diarrhea and nausea-a sure sign that chlorine dioxide kills the cancer cells. I took this information.
Then I made the CDS as a video in Youtube (Mr. Kalcker). I started to give, instead of MMS drops CDS in a ratio of 1 ml of CDS-like three drops of MMS. In terms MMC CDS I give him every hour CDS diluted in water. The question is, am I doing it right??
2000 Protocol against cancer involves the use of MMS+MMS2. And it promises results. And when I began to use CDS father ceased to feel normal for MMC dry mouth and a little nauseous the first 10 minutes. Does this mean that the CDS does not work? Maybe I should go back to using MMS?
Again, I started reading a book about MMS and it says that chlorine dioxide is only the first minutes after the activation of MMs, how then chlorine dioxide is stored in theCDS?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

CDS or MMS in protocol 2000 18 Apr 2013 14:43 #32630

  • pam
  • pam's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Posts: 4593
  • Thank you received: 3702
Vitalii - welcome to the forum.
With CDS, if you are making it by the heat method, it would be good if you had testing strips to see how many ppms you have. For right now, you can start where you are with the 1ml per hour, but you can also increase over time, up to 5ml per hour - We are always told that it's best to start at a lower dose and go higher.

Nausea and diarrhea can be true herx reactions or they can be a reaction to the citric acid or other products you find in MMS (which are not in CDS) - I use CDS because it does not cause me stomach distress - I use MMS for external applications, like the skin spray, etc. It sounds as though you are doing the CDS correctly, from what you have written.

If you use MMS2, remember to start very slowly - just 1/8 of a size '0' capsule, and increase to 1/2 a size '0' capsule. (It changed last year from size '00' to '0'

I'm not sure where you read about chlorine dioxide is only the first few moments after activation - surely not in Jim Humble's book. I consider Jim Humble's book to be the expert on it. I was reading in a cancer book that tried to push MMS into the author's ideas about pH. He was wrong. But it has been written and it is out there, and people assume that it must be the truth.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

CDS or MMS in protocol 2000 18 Apr 2013 14:45 #32631

  • pam
  • pam's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Posts: 4593
  • Thank you received: 3702
There are other things for your dad, too - the inhalation therapies (look in the book under the dental procedure), and also, Amanda Mary at the Bulgaria center is using "washes" with DMSO, which she has described in a recent post to Verkunder.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

CDS or MMS in protocol 2000 18 Apr 2013 19:04 #32638

  • Vitalii
  • Vitalii's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Posts: 4
  • Thank you received: 0
Thanks for the advice. Tell me, Protocol 101 runs for cancer?? I mean that I stop to convert a drop of MMS in the CDS. Instead, I take the first day of 1 ml of CDS per hour, the second day of 2 ml, etc., to 5, I understood correctly? And one more question. I'm doing a CDS in the following way .. I take 50 ml of 28% sodium chlorite, 50 ml of 50% citric acid, then heated in a glass container that the hot water. Gas is sent through a hose into a plastic bottle 500 ml with water below 10 degrees Celsius. After five minutes, the reaction stops and I get a 500 ml of CDS. This is the right way? I do not quite understand what it means 3000, 6000, 12000 PPM? I'm sorry I did not quite understand in chemistry))) That way, I get that CDS, I would get 3000, 6000 or 12000 solution? This is important in my case?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

CDS or MMS in protocol 2000 18 Apr 2013 22:51 #32647

  • pam
  • pam's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Posts: 4593
  • Thank you received: 3702
You need to get testing strips to see what strength your CDS is. I can't tell you from your description - the heat method is not as simple as the shot glass method, but the shot glass method takes 12 hours and no heat, and it's dependent on the bottle size, the mixing container size and amount of water. - www.mmsinfo.org/infosheets/cds_making_shot_glass_method.pdf That file is going to be updated in the next day or so. But it may be easier to understand the shot glass method.

Dosing is dependent on the strength of the CDS - It can be any ppm. The reaction continues on until all the chlorine dioxide gas is out of the mixing bottle and in the water in the receiving bottle, (and the mixing bottle has clear liquid in it) - it can take an hour or longer for the reaction to finish with the heat method.

With 3000ppm of CDS, you will use 1mL of CDS which is equal to 3 drops of MMS. Protocol 101 starts with 10mL of 3000ppm CDS in your daily bottle (8 doses) and then increases up to as high as 50mL in the daily bottle.

Pam
The following user(s) said Thank You: Researcher

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

CDS or MMS in protocol 2000 19 Apr 2013 08:19 #32651

  • Vitalii
  • Vitalii's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Posts: 4
  • Thank you received: 0
Thanks for the advice. There is still a question. Which method is preferable? "Shot Glass" Method or "hot method" (I saw it in YouTube and applied to obtain a solution)

I was convinced by experience, in the hot method, many dioxide Chlorine is wasted through the vent of the drain. I understand all of the gas in the method of the "short glass" is dissolved in the receiving vessel. Am I right? Then what about the temperature of the host liquid? Mr. Kalcker said that the water must be below 11 degrees Celsius, and in the method of "short glass" says 21 degrees. Please explain these features, or specify where I read about it.
Sincerely, Vitalii

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Last edit: by Vitalii.

CDS or MMS in protocol 2000 19 Apr 2013 12:25 #32653

  • pam
  • pam's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Posts: 4593
  • Thank you received: 3702
This was the very FIRST video on how to make CDS - we have evolved so much since then.

For those without testing strips, I prefer the shotglass method, as long as they have similar utensils to the powerpoint that is at www.mmsinfo.org Those results have been tested over and over.

If you have testing strips and can monitor the strength of the ppms, then you can do the heat method, it is faster.

Pam

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Page:
  • 1