phaelosopher.wordpress.com/2011/07/27/another-dose-of-clear-chem-speak-on-mms/
Another Dose of Clear Chem-Speak on MMS
phaelosopher | July 27, 2011 at 5:22 pm | Tags: Alternative Health, Alternative Medicines, Cancer, chlorine dioxide, FDA, Jim Humble, MMS | Categories: Alternative Medicines, FDA, MMS | URL:
wp.me/p1OJN-A5
Some of you will recall the row we had a few months ago with Wikipedia's biased, masquerading as informative "
Miracle Mineral Supplement
" entry, and how its editors doggedly persisted in protecting the toxic inferences and dismissing the beneficial accounts. (The bias is still there.) This tidbit was posted today on the YouTube thread by Frootloopsian.
Gravity Theory, upon reading your post, I began to research all potential sites where the average person would find this inaccurate ClO2 info. Wikipedia was first, and CRIPES! 95% of the ClO2 page is WRONG. At no point is the addition of Citric Acid to the Sodium Chlorite mentioned. The other bullcrap about ClO2, and the methods of production are misleading and incomplete. The industrial processes are well-known to me, and not one of them can be used to clean drinking water. That page actually bothers me. It's no wonder that people don't know dick about ClO2, its production methods, or it's detoxification by citric acid. Note that fed. warning regarding the ClO2. Notice that the idiots leave out the Citric Acid inclusion for drinking water and MMS? Of course, they don't mention WF10 either.
I have binders filled with ALL ClO2 information, and there are specific notices/warnings stating that ClO2 for potable water ONLY BE MADE BY THE SODIUM CHLORITE with CITRIC ACID method.
Now, while the "Miracle Mineral Supplement" Wikipedia entry does mention adding Citric Acid, the Chlorine Dioxide entry does not.
Here's one that really got my attention, with replies given in pure Chem-Speak. Remember that Footman is a staunch MMS naysayer, who fashions himself as being well informed:
FOOTMAN: I can't believe I'm back here. I'm going to hell for this post. WF10 is NOT CLO2. It's 1:10 tetrachlorodecaoxide (H2Cl4O11-4) in an IV solution. Clear on that? Not CLO2. And it's not a bactericidal action, it's an immuno-modulator.
However, (referring to an article) out today...
"Effect of WF10 (Immunokine) on Diabetic Foot Ulcer Therapy: A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial," Narongchai Yingsakmongkol, Paiboon Maraprygsavan, Phongthon Sukosit
Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery published online 04 July 2011.
FROOTLOOPSIAN: Footman, if you do go to hell, it won't be due to the post. It will be due to your ongoing misinformation drive. The order of events must be observed here. You state that the WF10 has nothing to do with Sodium Chlorite or Citric Acid. Return to the OXO CHEMIE AG original patent. In other words, return to the combination which actually worked, and because of that success, received the 4 patents. WF10 is the name used from the "Example 1" forward. The accepted legal description is worded WF10......is hereby incorporated by reference, by the oxidation of a Chlorite solution with Hypochlorite. All other papers which I have read regarding WF10 refer to Sodium Chlorite as the beginning point. Various acids are used. Tracking agents are used. The continuing theme involves the creation of a chlor-oxygen species.
I see that you offer some BS foot ulcer study. OF COURSE it has nothing to do with Sodium Chlorite, Citric Acid, and Calcium Hypochlorite. IF these guys are using the legally registered, patented WF10 designation, they'll likely be hearing from someone. Personally, I believe that IF the WF10 designation is being used outside of OXO CHEMIE AG, it will be done as a "smokescreen" intended to remove the original WF10 study involving Sodium Chlorite/Citric Acid/Calcium Hypochlorite away from public scrutiny.
Footman, how is it possible to create a "ClO2/Citric Acid Cocktail"? I believe that the chemistry I have provided here, and in the "MMS, What They Don't Want You to Know-No Scam..." video, will move many people past the BS posted by people like you. Last night, I thought through the possible molecules, and element daughters. The possible inadvertent production of chloral based pesticide is eliminated, as is the potential of decay leading to a radioactive daughter. The chlorine 38 isotope becomes argon 38, and is harmless.
The fact that gold, Au79, is actually Au2Cl6 never leaves my mind, and that combination will become the "conductor" of the 17 Cl 38 (per NuBase 17 Cl 38) beta- action. An interesting benefit of that action, is the conversion of mercury to gold. In other words, all of that vaccine mercury is GONE! The immune system, and brain activity, return to normal. And, THAT is going to piss off the sheeple creators.
Always remember the beta- 17 Cl 38 isotope, and what its decay produces. Remember what elements are effected in good ways, by that action. Remember that the Sodium, Chlorine and Calcium channels are keys. Remember that Citric Acid, Krebs Cycle, synthesis of ATP for the repair of faulty "voltage gating" are all critical parts of this.
So far, I haven't found anything which alarms me. The initial key involves the Citric acid based detoxification of the ClO2, and the further Citric Acid driven Krebs Cycle leading to the ATP synthesis. Some may notice the "mercury to gold" idea, and consider it not possible.
Enjoy the rest of your day. (Not you, footman...)
The very high energy produced by the 17 Cl 38 beta- will likely "bombard" the 80 Mercury with a neutron. Mercury 80 plus 1 neutron= Gold 79+ one alpha particle which is released on impact. Therefore, that vaccine mercury doesn't work as intended.
Outta here. No more time. Footman, your adios is the previous "box".
I suggested to Jim Humble several months ago, that it appeared to me that chlorine dioxide, and now we might make the distinction of
this formulation of chlorine dioxide acts as an "un-doer." The eloquent, very chemical language articulated above seems to offer confirmation.
This is the
link
to the entire comment thread.
