TOPIC:

Occasionally Jim Humble comes on the forum and posts in miscellaneous forums. Those posts can get lost in the large variety of posts that we have on the forum. I'm opening this thread to simply move a copy of his posts into one place for easy reference. I will lock this thread, so that responses can be kept with the originating post, if you are interested. This post can be found at

g2cforum.org/index.php/list/attacks-on-or-criticism-of-genesis-ii-sacraments-and-responses/148-attack-on-the-use-of-mms-to-detox-people-in-the-gulf#31863


About Vitamin C and other nutrients taken while on protocol 1000 and all of the other protocols. Because of what has already been said here. We have been able to determine through the testing and observation of actually hundreds of cases the the less vitamins, minerals, and other nutrients taken the better the patient does. For best results don't take vitamin C at the end of the day; don't take it at all.

Thousands of cases over ten years there has never been evidence of oxidative stress. That's just one more thing the critics can scream about because they think there is no way to disprove them. But the simple fact is, breathing produces hundreds of times more oxygen and doesn't produce oxidative stress and oxygen is a much stronger oxidizer than MMS. Also the oxidative stress theory of aging of the body has been disproved thus the whole theory of oxidative stress is in question. Here is one article, there are now many others, www2.uni-jena.de/biologie/ieu/he/own_pub/Ristow_ExpGerontol2010.pdf

So what we know from hundreds of observations is that you increase the time required for recovery by adding nutrients of all kinds. Sometimes it helps to add digestive microorganisms, but nothing else. You see, pathogens and parasites both need good nutrition and they always get the first bit out of the nutrients and it helps them survive.

There is no evidence that the lady in Australia died from oxidative stress. The FDA and dozens of critics would have been so happy if they had arrested our people for murder. As it was they caused the autopsy to be held up for a year so they could get maximum mileage out of the idea that it might have been MMS that caused the death. But finally they had to release the autopsy and let it show that MMS had nothing to do with the death. Around the world while more than300 people died of taking aspirin and thousands from other drugs there was not a single MMS death even in question.

g2cforum.org/index.php/list/mms-technical-talk/25711-analysis-certificate-sodium-chlorite-arsenic-pb-mercury-problem#31813

About mercury in sodium chlorite. When you buy sodium chlorite powder it is generally somewhere around 80% sodium chlorite. Then 16 to 17% plain old table salt, sodium chloride. And the rest 3 to 4% are the various sodium chemicals that are non poisonous and often use in food to change the taste or adjust the pH. The tiny amounts of poisonous chemicals are arsenic, lead, and mercury. The quantities listed so far are always less than what is considered safe to consume.

Mercury is usually listed at 0.1 ppm or less in sodium chlorite. If you search on the internet you will see that 0.5 ppm is generally considered safe to eat when found in fish. That's 5 times more than sodium chlorite. So if you eat a 6 ounce fish you will be consuming approximately 31 micrograms of mercury which is generally considered safe.

So do you see? In the first place Sodium chlorite is 5 time less than what is considered safe in fish if you eat 6 ounces. But you don't eat six ounces of sodium chlorite. You in fact take 3 drops in a dose or 24 drops in a day for protocol 1000. Each drop has about 12 mg of sodium chlorite. So in the fish your are getting 31 micrograms of mercury in a day, assuming you don't eat more than one fish in a day. So in a days dose of MMS you will get 580 times less mercury than you would get by eating the fish. So if eating the fish is safe, eating 580 times less should be safe, which is 0.05 micrograms approximately. Which is probably less than you would get from playing in your back yard for 20 minutes. The other poisonous metals have similar reading. You simply can not get enough poisonous metals from sodium chlorite to be dangerous no matter how you tried.
Archbishop Jim Humble

g2cforum.org/index.php/list/general-discussion/25758-studies-re-chlorine-dioxide?start=9#31405

Reply to Peri1224

I don't know what kind of a response Troth deserves, but let me say that 14 mg/kg equals 180 mg a day since the protocol calls for 3 drops an hour according to Peri1224. But therein lies the mistake. It is said in my book any number of times and in my writings that MMS (chlorine dioxide) only lasts 1 to 1.5 hours in the human body. Thus, although one might take 180 mg in a day's time, there is never more than 18 mg in the body when doing the protocol 1000. SO THE DISTANCE FROM THE 980 CRITICAL MILLIGRAMS MENTIONED IN THE TROTH REPORT IS QUITE COMFORTABLE AFTER ALL. The dose being taken is 49 times smaller than the critical 980 milligrams in the report.

Then, of course, the U.S. Council of Environmental Quality in the same report is not talking about chlorine dioxide, but rather chlorination which is totally different. Not the same thing at all. You are trying to evaluate apples against grapes and you can't.

The clinical trials of the world shows us that there can't be much of a problem with taking MMS as although more than 300 deaths last year were attributed to aspirin none were attributed to MMS. Although more than 10 million have used MMS. I assure you that the FDA and many other medical people and, of course the critics who know nothing, would be thrilled to find a single death caused by MMS. They could scream and point their finger and talk about charging the Genesis 2 church with the death. But, sorry, they can't find a single one.

g2cforum.org/index.php/list/general-discussion/25628-jim-humble-had-massive-spinal-tumor-removed-in-early-2009#30616

I have heard this lie from time to time. I don't know how important it is. In this case Sarah is just trying to make me look bad. It is totally not true. I have never had an operation for a cancer of any kind. I had one operation for a hernia which is a standard operation that the medical people have that works. Nothing else of significance. But certainly no cancer operations. Jim