TOPIC:

CLO2 wrote:
"Would you like to venture a guess as to why CDS doesn't kill Malaria (Parasitic Plasmodium) and MMS does kill it?"

The only report of cds not working, that I'm aware of, came from Africa on the occasion of a minister of health treating some malaria sufferers at gun point, and only given one chance. Unfortunately it didn't work out.

Others more knowledgeable than I am should reply. Michael?

I'm not more knowledgeable on this specific incident, but Jim has mentioned in his latest book that they are finding different strains of mosquitos seem to carry different strains of malaria, and even using the old MMS formulation, some responded to the 6+6 protocol, some required the 15+15 protocol (remember the original protocol was 30+30)

If chlorine dioxide is responsible for the cures, why the MMS1 (with citric acid) and the CDS does not seem to work just as well? Does the combination of MMS1 and the CA would produce a byproduct more efficient than chlorine dioxide per se?

from my experience,
CDS seems to be extremely effective in some areas,
MMS(1) seems to be extremely effective in some areas,
MMS 2 seems to be extremely effective in some areas.

the challenge is figuring out where these substances belong and do the best amount of work,
finding out where each of the solutions are superior to the other, yet make no mistake about it; its all extremely powerful tools.

.

I see an obvious difference between CDS & MMS at least for my 74 year old mother. She cannot tolerate MMS at all, even at one drop an hour. It triggers uncontrollable massive diarrhea. She is able to take the full daily dose of CDS without any diarrhea at all. That's a huge difference I think.

I have the same experience than Mickey with my own mother with 74 years old too and very sensitive with the MMS1, but she has not significant results with CDS.

Please re-send the Balanced Chemical Reactions attachment. I cannot open this one. Thank You!

That chemical reactions show that HClO₂ may fall apart to Cl^- and Cl₂. Aren't that two products harmful and carcinogenic?

My guess about reported ineffectiveness of CDS in malaria case is that CDS is generally impoverished, refined form of MMS solution. In CDS there is only ClO₂ that we call the active agent, yet in reality it's not the only active agent in the MMS solution. According to equations that we can see in enclosed file with the MMS solution we ingest amongst others:

1. C₆H₅Na₃O₇ ( E331 Sodium citrates ) - it's used as a preservative so it must have some antibacterial properties, it also has anti-clotting effect and I think it may help with decreasing blood pressure
2. HClO ( Hypochlorous acid ) - as we know it's the agent to which the MMS2 owes it's power
3. NaCl - it's ordinary table salt, yet we should be aware that that simple substance is bacteriostatic, that's why we can find it in so many food products, it keeps pathogens away
4. Cl^- - chlorine anion
5. Cl₂ - dichlorine

As we can see they differ pretty much. We should be aware that some of the aformentioned compenents may work with each other in a synergistic way. The effects of chlorine anion and dichlorine I'd like to get to know. As fair as I remember Jim Humble explaining the difference between chlorine and chlorine dioxide in his MMS brochure said that chlorine dioxide rips off hole in a pathogen's cell wall while chlorine combines kils pathogens and combines with other compounds producing at times even more dangerous substances than chlorine alone. I hope neither Cl^- nor Cl₂ are poisonous.
To recap, MMS1 has wider operating range. MMS2 can be more effective in cases where pathogens are more sensitive to HClO than to ClO₂. CDS can be more effecteve in cases where pathogens are highly sensitive to ClO₂ and the patient intolerates some of MMS solution ingredients (e.g. citric acid) or lower pH.

Some people have problems with opening the enclosure, so I upload it again in a pdf format.