MOS with Liam Scheff - HIV Testing
Myths of Science Episode 2 - part one of a two on HIV Testing. Liam explains why he dislikes HIV tests, and feels they are inhumane, unethical and also that they suck monkey balls, and should be illegal.
liamscheff.com/the-hiv-aids-investigation/
Referenced Quotes about HIV/AIDS Tests and Measurements
Viral Load (PCR; Polymerase Chain Reaction)
Viral load tests are often claimed to detect the genetic material of HIV, either the DNA integrated into cells or the RNA in viral particles circulating in the body. Yet these tests search for only a small fraction of the HIV genome, and HIV has never been properly isolated, a step which would be necessary to allow the genome to be unambiguously determined. Furthermore, the viral load test cannot distinguish between infectious and defective virus, and in some studies only 1 out of 60,000 viral particles was estimated to be infectious. Papers published before PCR was widely available (mostly pre-1990) use different types of test, such as Southern Blot, to detect and measure DNA and RNA.
aras.ab.ca/test-pcr.html
Antibody tests are the most commonly performed. Usually an ELISA test is performed, and then repeated if positive. Following that, for positive ELISAs only, a Western Blot (WB) is performed. ELISA is not a Yes/No test, it is only a continuum of color change that is interpreted in this way because of an arbitrary cutoff point. Western Blot has the purported HIV proteins separated on a strip, with various methods used for interpretation (varying from country to country, and from organization to organization). Both types of tests measure antibodies, which in many diseases are considered a sign of immunity (particularly in the absence of symptoms). Why are antibody tests considered a sign of fatal disease in HIV/AIDS? Why are two of the same type of test used to validate each other?
aras.ab.ca/test.html
CD4/CD8 Immune Cell Counts
Low CD4 cell counts (or abnormal CD4/CD8 ratios) are considered to be an unambiguous sign of the progression of AIDS, yet science does not support this. There are people with AIDS with normal CD4 cell counts and healthy people with low CD4 cell counts. Over a large group of people, it may well be true that on average, low CD4 cell counts identify a group of people who are more likely to be in ill health, but this logic does not apply to all individuals. Furthermore, even if low CD4 cell counts were always associated with ill health, it would not necessarily follow that artificially raising these counts with toxic drugs would be beneficial. CD4 cell counts are a type of Surrogate Marker, a lab measurement that substitutes for a real measure of health. Consequently, decisions made on the basis of CD4 cell counts should be interpreted with caution, particularly decisions that could prove damaging, such as starting antiretroviral medications.
“When an AIDS doctor declares that a patient with a CD4 count is “severely immune-suppressed” he is making a prediction based on the CD4 count with near certainty. When a doctor proclaims that an HIV positive person’s CD4 count of 200 or 350 or 500 shows that it is “time to start drugs” they are also making a prediction on the basis of a CD4 count, a prediction with implied certainty. Perhaps, if pressed, the doctor might admit that there are some people with low CD4 counts who are not sick, but the basic message is that CD4 counts have been shown, scientifically, to be highly accurate indicators of your stage of “progression to AIDS” – from asymptomatic to pre-AIDS (“AIDS-related complex”) to full-blown AIDS and then death. But, what is the evidence that CD4 counts are associated with stage of immune suppression? And, how accurate would a prediction that a certain CD4 count indicates that a person is at a particular stage of HIV or AIDS be?”
aras.ab.ca/test-cd4.html
Does AIDS Cause HIV?
The AIDS Investigation
Tags: AIDS Drugs, HIV test, HIV/AIDS
May 13, 2010 2
by Liam Scheff for OMSJ.org
liamscheff.com/the-hiv-aids-investigation/
How we’ve gotten AIDS wrong for 25 years, and how to fix it…
Those ‘in the know,’ who read and scour and search the medical literature on AIDS and HIV testing, are well aware that neither of these belief systems works according to their promised plan. Here’s how it was supposed to go:
A single unique particle, (originally called LAV, then HTLV-III, then rechristened HIV) gets into the body via semen or blood exchange; it gravitates somehow to the white blood cells called T-Cells; it opens the cell door, somehow, and copies itself into the genome, using an enzyme called Reverse Transcriptase. These cells are then impaired, and die, supposedly. This weakens the body over time and other illnesses occur.
That’s the official narrative. But only more or less, because there are so many alterations and versions of the official story at this point that it’s hard to keep up. “Maybe cells aren’t killed directly, maybe latent infection is really active, maybe constant exposure causes immunity…” The official story has caused nothing but headaches and trauma for the mainstream, as it’s never held together, and no part of it is ably demonstrated or proven. In fact, most aspects of the story are countered by observation.
That is, there is no unique, purified, isolated, gold standard particle called “LAV,” or “HTLV-III,” or “HIV.” There are many divergent proteins that are grabbed out of blood samples through antibody testing, and a far greater number of genetic threads, copied out of cell cultures by a touchy, highly sensitive technology called PCR. All of these are supposed to be “HIV.”
This wild diversity of fragments gave CDC cop and New York Times pharma-shill Lawrence Altman the impetus to coin his second-most famous line: “HIV, the wily retrovirus.” (His first is “The virus that causes AIDS.“)
And right there you have the second major problem. AIDS is about, well, if I said 10,000 diseases, I’d be in the ballpark. It is a disease category as long as Pinocchio’s nose, and as deep as a the Grand Canyon. It grows at will, and can never be filled up – it grows and goes. Any disease can be called “AIDS” if it occurs in people who the medical cops think are “at risk for AIDS.”
www.umlingo.wozaonline.co.za/Medicinal+fraud
The History of the AIDS Epidemic
excerpt from Deadly Deception
1994
HIV does not cause AIDS....
The point that everyone is missing is that all of those original papers Gallo wrote on HIV have been found fraudulent.... The HIV hypothesis was based on those papers. — Peter Duesberg
How the Lie Began
www.umlingo.wozaonline.co.za/DEADLY+DECEPTION
AIDS truth exposed: HIV can be cured with proper nutrition!
Dr. Luc Montagnier who is credited with the discovery of HIV speaks of how drugs are unnecessary and that HIV can be cured with proper nutrition!
Shocking un-cut footage from Brent Leung's documentary "House of Numbers" reveals truth about AIDS as told by Dr. Luc Montagnier. AIDS can be reversed. Nutrition is the answer. Hear it straight from the co-discoverer of HIV. Posted by NaturalNews.com
Tests
.
Reading the standard medical literature on HIV tests, you will discover that:
The Tests ‘test’ for no one thing.
They diagnose no one thing.
They do not show infection with any single thing.
HIV tests may tell you that you have an illness, or they may tell you that you are pregnant. They give no single response, and diagnose no single condition. They may indicate immune suppression, or any variety of major or minor ailments.
The complex details of HIV testing are not reported to the public; they remain hidden in the medical and industry journals, and are actively suppressed by major media in public discussion. These are important public issues, and we all should have a clear and unobstructed view of all available data, no matter how it affects or challenges a publicly-held idea or policy.
It is impossible in a court of law to receive a death sentence for any crime as easily as it is to receive a false reading on an HIV test. It is a label that cannot be overcome in court, and cannot be appealed under any circumstance.
reducetheburden.org/1-2/
HIV/AIDS TEST = STRESS TEST have even read some where that the CD4 TEST is more a measurement of FAT.
Do your coconut oil thing, add moringa, do your research, cannabis oil and a lot more roots and barks are out there to help your body heal itself of whatever condition you have, the magic juice and green smoothies are other options, try and get a proper diagnoses of what you have, perhaps its just parasites and worms... check out the parasite/worm protocol, once you know what you really have perhaps the docs dont know what it is but the old lady in the street and many more know what it is, treatable with many natural substances, besides all the testing what condition do you really have even if it seems small to you, perhaps someone right here on the forum knows and can help.
With time believe even viral load will go back to levels you are happy with...
Thanks,
