TOPIC:

Someone online trying to convince me CDS is toxic shared this with with me. Obviously it is a selective clipping, but even still I would like to try to find the ppm of these dosages, please.

If memory serves, there are about 6 mg of ClO2 in one drop of MMS1.
So, the lowest amount of ClO2 the rats were given was 20 mg per kg of body weight, which would be 3.3 drops per kg.
Now, if someone weighed 100 kg (not mentioning any names), he would need to take 333 drops in one dose to equal the lowest amount that the rats were given (and they all survived).

Please correct me if I'm wrong about any of the above, which I could easily be.

 

There has been enough empirical scientific and anecdotal research and
study and testing and usage that the amounts that we are using are
almost guaranteed to be 100% safe.

It would be almost impossible to "overdose" on ClO2.
Or use enough that it would negatively affect you in the long term.
You would have to do something really, really stupid, or I don't know what.

That has basically been proved over the last couple of decades.

So what is the ppm of this solution?  is it 2000ppm?

I also wanted to point out that the clipped pseudo-scientific text is taken
WAY out of context. That should be obvious.

IMO, vivisection pseudo-science (medical) research is Frankensteinian science
that has little real scientific value. It's OLD school and is mostly used to get grant money.
They keep doing the same studies over and over and over. (for the last several decades)
Some in the medical research sciences are advocating for vivisection to be stopped
and computer modeling to be used now.
It's part of the Pharmaceutical Industrial Complex, Medical Industrial Complex,
Vivisection Industrial Complex, and related BS.
They are all multi-BILLION dollar industries that need to be erased for the most part.

My 'guess' is the study mentioned involved an LD-50 test to see what VERY HIGH
amounts of ClO2 cause 50% of the rat population to die. The person using it as
some sort of evidence or proof about ClO2 being toxic and dangerous simply
does not know what they are talking about. It is EXTREME ignorance.

Notice that they talk about mg PER kg of body weight.
It would be literally impossible for a human being to consume that amount of ClO2.

I think if you read the whole study, you would see that their conclusion was
ACTUALLY that ClO2 is VERY, VERY SAFE at the amounts that we consume.

You can fairly easily kill yourself trying to drink a few gallons of water, too,
so I suppose we should all stop drinking water.
(this has sadly happened more than once in Fraternity hazings, one at Chico State University,
I believe, within the last 20 to 30 years or so)
 

The PPM of a solution is fairly linear to the amount of water its diluted in.
Example:
5 drops in 1 liter water= 30ppm
50 drops = 300ppm
500 drops = 3000ppm

I don't think ppm here is relevant. Consider instead the amounts given per body weight.
These white coated morons gave these poor animals 80 and 40 mg per kilo of body weight. 
I weigh 90 kg - this would be like giving me 7200 mg (for 80 mg) or 3600 mg (for 40 mg). That's 72 grams or 36 grams in one dose. I'm sure I'd be dead too if I was stupid enough to ingest that much MMS in one go. 
To put it in perspective, the 1000 protocol involves 3 drops per hour. Each drop has about 3mg, therefore the 1000 protocol is 9mg per hour per body weight. that is - 9mg per 90 kg in my case. That is 0.125% of the amount administered to those poor rats.
And these idiots call this science.

yes that is ridiculous the mg per kg of weight!! I just wanted to check if my calculation for this was right ...so is it 2000ppm for this solution?

Yes you are correct - 1000000 X .2/100 = 2000 PPM.
By contrast, taking 3 drops as Protocol 1000 in 100 ml of water = 90 PPM. The rodents had no chance.
This is a perfect example of how they abuse "science" to discredit natural remedies.