TOPIC:

ASSUMING that his cancer returned because of the vaccine is irrational and nonsensical
since it could simply be coincidence. (probably was) You are, AT BEST, "guessing".
(not that believing one way or another is going to do much of anything anyway)

If you follow Jim Humble's protocols I expect him to achieve Health Restoration
within a matter of a few months or so. Could be longer, but I would bet not even
a year at the outside.

You MIGHT need some other stuff than "MMS", but I would 'guess' probably not.
Although, you might need to use some of the advanced protocols, like Protocol 2000.
I would generally suggest you at least go up through Protocol 2000 "just to make sure".

That is, from a Detox, to a Super-Detox.

"ASSUMING that his cancer returned because of the vaccine is irrational and nonsensical
since it could simply be coincidence. (probably was) You are, AT BEST, "guessing".
(not that believing one way or another is going to do much of anything anyway)"

You are obviously unaware of the number of cancers that have occurred following the so called vaccinations.  I personally know of three cases where aggressive cancers have returned (after long remissions) within just 2- 3 months of the individuals being vaccinated. I think it is "irrational and nonsensical" to ignore cause and effect - especially where the effect has such a recent common cause.
I suggest you expand your information base beyond TV and newspapers. There are many sources - including the database of adverse effects among the US military which recorded a massive increase in cancers following mandatory vaccinations..
Otherwise, thanks for your other suggestions.

I do read and study and research multiple sources.

Anecdotal stories MUST be taken with a LARGE Grain of Salt.

People naturally tend to take a few instances of whatever and
generalize that into "everyone all the time". (or too much so)
(I forget at the moment what that is called)
(for example, "I personally know X number of people who....")

There is NO verifiable "cause and effect" except in your guesstimation and
interpretation and most likely skewed and biased thinking.
(from which we ALL suffer, but some more than others)

Pretending that they are absolute or even "mean anything" or anything like that
is irrational and nonsensical and anti-scientific and anti-medical.

There ABSOLUTELY WILL be some number of cancers and reoccurence
and other illnesses and diseases after vaccinations. MOST of those will have
occurred ANYWAY. That is statistically 100% TRUE. We KNOW this to be
true and to have been PROVED time and time again over many decades of
medical and scientific research and the like. (using statistics and other means)

That is why they do double-blind large scale studies so they can "know"
within a reasonable doubt, or better, statistically, that something is happening
or not.

Without that, you are GUESSING. (and might as well flip a coin)

A bunch of "Internet 'research'" is NOT a valid working methodology to
come to any reasonable conclusions about much of anything.
Not with any real certainty or surety. (unless you can verify it in some way,
shape, or form that is MEANINGFUL; like, for example, using MMS and
seeing what it does for you and others with whom you have personal contact ---
Something like "The Scientific Method", as much as possible)

That is 100% TRUE, as well.

And the "Do your own research" has become a JOKE, because it IS,
because MOST people are NOT CLOSE to being able to perform any
decent research or study because their Objectivity and Logic and
Critical Thinking skills and Knowledge and Experience, etc.,
are NOT up to par. (MOST people I meet OBVIOUSLY fall into this category)

I do pretty well in that area, and even I am not really "up to par",
but I probably do better than most people.

If you are unaware of all this, or it doesn't even cross your mind,
or you either will not or cannot take it under SERIOUS consideration,
then you are most likely in that group who is "failing". (too often,
more often than not, etc... it's a form of being Clueless)
(based on your attitudes and what you say, you seem to be in this group)

You can usually spot issues when people do not mention the things
I've mentioned above, and who 'speak' with WAY too much certainty and
surety (about things that are more or less near impossible to be THAT
certain or sure about), and who do not qualify their statements, etc....

Beyond that, I suppose we will have to agree to disagree.
 

I just saw this video and it states the CDS was directly shot into the cancer tumor itself. 
i have some to a friend who had  stage 4 colon cancer but she died two days later from The cancer. I wish she works have started it 3 years before!! 

Here’s the video

www.bitchute.com/video/XiHw1WNDQEC4/