TOPIC:

philosophers-stone.info/2022/12/25/dr-lee-merritt-big-pharmas-mrna-black-goo-lee-merritt-harald-kautz-medical-interview/

For those who are confused about graphene, and snake venom, maybe other issues, and those interested in a detox treatment, this interview imay be helpful. 
In the meantime, factual evidence of the C-19 virus created in a Wuhan lab has come to light.
You find the reports, but don't look in mainstream media. Tucker Carlson, The Morgan Report, and The Expose, for example, are reliable sources.
 

Hello Bill, I expect you're stuck in the earlier years of Tucker's reports. Is it your negligence, that you seem to take no notice of the need to present evidence with documents or experiences, making statements like yours? Are you a creature of habits? Your credibility sinks, 10 points off for Slitherin.

It is a very weak argument to cherry pick a few items in an attempt to discredit an individual or organization... a proverbial throwing the baby out with the bath water. Just a few topics such as "weapons of mass destruction", "Michael Brown", "Nick Sandman", "safe and effective" could be used to determine that ALL news outlets are nothing more than purveyors of, as you put it, "gross, disgusting, indecent, treasonous, traitorous CRAP". The attack on Ivermectin as only a horse dewormer should be enough to have any logically minded person questioning the accuracy and, more importantly, the integrity of the outlet that was spewing such nonsense. Does that mean the outlet never factually reports? Of course not, only a fool would stumble into such a conclusion.

The problem is, as I see it, news has moved into a bias system. It's so obvious they even put out a bias ranking document each year to help people see where their preferred outlet ranks. What should be evident, but apparently incomprehensible by the average individual, is that ranking news by bias has no value. It does, however, enable one to reinforce their choice of echo chamber(s). News should be ranked by factual reporting and nothing else. If news isn't factual, it isn't news, it's fiction. The difficulty in today's environment is a reporter must check their personal bias and be objective. Ironically, what the stated argument against Tucker presents.
 

BillPopMMS wrote:

Pffttt.

No.

Tucker Carlson is a Treasonous Traitor and effective if not actual Domestic Terrorist.

He always has been and he always will be.

It's just become increasingly evident over the years.

And his now-known LIES are coming out:

Fox News host Tucker Carlson said in a text message after the 2020 election that
he "passionately hated" Donald Trump, according to new court filings.

Mr Carlson's message to a colleague in January 2021 emerged as part of
a defamation lawsuit by Dominion Voting Systems against Fox News.

"We are very, very close to being able to ignore Trump most nights,"
he wrote in a text sent on 4 January 2021. "I truly can't wait."
"I hate him passionately," he added.

Mr Carlson ... also appeared to denigrate the Trump presidency in these
private messages, despite lauding his achievements on air.

"That's the last four years. We're all pretending we've got a lot to show for it,
because admitting what a disaster it's been is too tough to digest. But come on.
There isn't really an upside to Trump."

AND: Fox Stars Privately Expressed Disbelief About Election Fraud Claims. ‘Crazy Stuff.’

The comments, by Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity and others, were released
as part of a defamation suit against Fox News by Dominion Voter Systems.

And there is much, much more gross, disgusting, indecent, treasonous,
traitorous CRAP from ALL of them at Faux Nooz.

I'm not surprised at all that you are pro-TC and pro-FoxNews.
That is obviously the type of person you are and choose to be.
You have self-marginalized yourself and ruined your credibility
over and over again with your BS that you have posted on this forum.

 

Spouting your aggressive, holier than thou crap again hey.

I would be interested to know what news sources you deem to be credible.

BillPopMMS wrote:

stu77000 wrote:

{snip} wrote:

{snip}

Spouting your aggressive, holier than thou crap again hey.

I would be interested to kno
w what news sources you deem to be credible.


 

Typical idiotic ignorant crap you usually blather.

She comments "I expect you're stuck in the earlier years of Tucker's reports. Is it your negligence, that you seem to take no notice of the need to present evidence with documents or experiences, making statements like yours? Are you a creature of habits? Your credibility sinks..."

I reply to that BULLSHIT, and you jump on ME and not her.

That says it all. It shows what kind of person you are and choose to be, as well.

Fuck you.


Classy.... now tell us, what news sources do you consider to be credible?

Er.... getting right away from the odious topic of American Politics, I would like to get back to the topic - Covid 19.
Covid 19 was not created in a laboratory - Tucker Carlson et al are full of shit when they claim this. 
It was only the Spike Protein (that provides docking to cells for the alleged virus) that was created. The so called pandemic was just Flu rebranded. I would very much doubt whether there is the technical capability to even create a new virus.
There is overwhelming evidence that deaths due to Covid-19 during the fakedemic were all due to other causes - in one case even a fatal motor cycle accident. The whole plan was to ramp up fear among a credulous population.
The spike protein is the essential element of the MRNA injection material. It is what causes illness and death.This has been confirmed in Germany and Japan (and probably elsewhere by now).
Does MMS destroy the spike protein? It most certainly does. My wife's brother died soon after receiving his 4th injection (2nd booster).  My wife attended his funeral and wake - at which were all the "vaccinated" relatives. She returned home 2 days later feeling in her own words like dying. She had been subjected to shedding. I put her to bed and started giving an hourly MMS dose at the rate of 3 drops. During the first and second days she experienced a massive Herxheimer reaction - vomiting and diarrhea like I've never seen. The material that came up was luminescent with a horrid metallic smell.
By the end of the 3rd day she was normal again.
Whether this would be effective for someone who had been jabbed (we aren't), will I assume depend on whether the MRNA process produces the spike protein permanently. THEY say is doesn't - but as we all know - THEY are f###ing liars.
 

I agree with everything you stated except for the slight technicality of the origination of SARS-CoV-2. You are correct in that a new coronavirus wasn't created but that a new human infectible variant was engineered from an already existing virus. The moniker Covid-19 (and SARS-CoV-2) was only given because the virus infected humans. We could further argue the semantics but in layman understanding, without the furin cleavage alteration there would have never been a CV-19, many will say a new virus was made in the lab. Sure, they should state that a new human infectious variant was engineered in a lab but it really doesn't warrant the proper distinction when the focus is on it being man-made/lab created. Should the news be more accurate, of course, unfortunately we've lived in the world of "Obama Care", "Don't Say Gay Bill", "Conspiracy Theory"...monikers for so long that it's become normalized and incorporated into every day communication. 

I agree - it's a possibility that an existing virus was re-engineered but I seriously doubt. Why go to all the trouble to artificially create a new variant that actually did very little damage. In fact no more than a typical flu season. Most of the victims were elderly or those with existing morbidities - and there's no shortage of those in our allopathic ridden medical system. It's also telling that the incidence of influenza pretty much vanished during the so called pandemic. The media did a masterful job of ramping up fear of what was a fake.
No - all THEY had to do was re-engineer or create a complex protein that forms the docking spike of any virus and use that in the Trojan Horse called the vaccine. It's the spike protein that is and continues to disable and kill people

My opinion, is it's all stages. There was definitely more hype than substance but that did create a high degree of jab uptake. Coupled with the massive amount of false positives (including the seasonal flu) and deadly hospital protocols, the general public was clambering for any solution. The ineffectiveness of the original virus wasn't consequential as that wasn't the end goal, why it was purposely over hyped in the beginning, since it was just a first step. I also think that the side effects we are seeing aren't the end result, just what is to be expected in a diverse population. What will come next will be amplified by the weakened immune systems of those that took the jab, creating an even higher level of anxiety and desire for totalitarian solutions. When looking into the funding sources, one would expect a very stringent phased deployment as that is the only way to control the stages. The implementation has been very effective, we are just in a lull...a loosening to manage public outrage and exhaustion. There have even been primers, Monkey Pox etc..., to condition everyone to expect another supposed pandemic that will be deployed soon. There are many ways to corral sheep but spending the time to properly train them will have them willingly saunter to the slaughter.