TOPIC:

Great...thank you!

 

Here's a table I made which compares the milligrams of CLO2 between Protocol C - C30 for COVID-19 and CDH4000, MMS Drops & The Antidote. MMS Drops & The Antidote both use MMS Drops which have been partially acidified outside the body and then are ingested. Protocol-1 uses these same drops but just allow the stomach acid to do everything internally. Notice how just 13 drops a day provides more mgs of CLO2 than C20 provides. And C20 is considered as a prevention for 1st Responders of COVID-19.




All the best,
Scott

Here's the entire document where the table above came from (see attached file below)

Scott

Devon wrote:

Hello Scott, after reading your signature in red about intraveinous use of the remedy or remedies, I wonder if testing your blood - and organs - quality right after that treatment, is proof of harmless effects, although I'd welcome it when it's harmless. I believe that testing for a longer time is valuable, and also a treatment on a person with infection symptoms.
so that "before and after" can be witnessed. See what I mean?
 

Oh yes, I totally agree that my before and after tests are not sufficient to be called proof that CDH is safe to be injected. Who knows, maybe there will be long-term side effects. I just reported my own personal info to help along the progress of our extremely limited experience with injecting CDH at 50 ppm. It is better than nothing though, and nothing is all we had up until the time I reported it. If only we had the will and million or billions of dollars like Big Pharma has. Then we could really do thorough studies. That will never happen in my lifetime though. The best we have now is what we have with Latin American doctors IVs with CDS. One of the reasons why I did it though is because I believe it probably is pretty safe and if someone is dying of some terrible bacterial infection which there is no antibiotic for, and they are going to die, then they just might want to give CDH a try - because they know through my test, that at least one person has done it and not had any known side effects. And if they try it, they might then just live.

Hope that clarifies things a bit.
Scott

I'm new to taking MMS, been taking it for 8 days now. Isn't protocol 1000, 3 drops of each, in 4 ounces of water?  I've been doing 24 drops of each in 32 ounces of water. I activate first then add water. 

my reason for joining this forum is last night I have a really sharp pain for about 3 hours in my liver area, right side of the body just under my ribs. If I moved a certain way, I could get the pain to stop but would return if I went back to old position.  I'm just concerned the MMS may be hurting me? I'm genuinely asking. Have you heard this happening before?  Any ideas?

Thanks in advance for your feedback 

Taking a protocol for something which doesn't exist. Well. Not sure how you can do that.

For Coronavirus it's your basic coughs and colds that type of thing.

I'm sure there's a protocol for that type of thing as well as influenza?

Truthquester wrote:

Devon wrote:

Hello Scott, after reading your signature in red about intraveinous use of the remedy or remedies, I wonder if testing your blood - and organs - quality right after that treatment, is proof of harmless effects, although I'd welcome it when it's harmless. I believe that testing for a longer time is valuable, and also a treatment on a person with infection symptoms.
so that "before and after" can be witnessed. See what I mean?

 

Oh yes, I totally agree that my before and after tests are not sufficient to be called proof that CDH is safe to be injected. Who knows, maybe there will be long-term side effects. I just reported my own personal info to help along the progress of our extremely limited experience with injecting CDH at 50 ppm. It is better than nothing though, and nothing is all we had up until the time I reported it. If only we had the will and million or billions of dollars like Big Pharma has. Then we could really do thorough studies. That will never happen in my lifetime though. The best we have now is what we have with Latin American doctors IVs with CDS. One of the reasons why I did it though is because I believe it probably is pretty safe and if someone is dying of some terrible bacterial infection which there is no antibiotic for, and they are going to die, then they just might want to give CDH a try - because they know through my test, that at least one person has done it and not had any known side effects. And if they try it, they might then just live.

Hope that clarifies things a bit.
Scott

Hello Scott, I read what your reasoning is, quite complex and a view on what would cure a dying person when nothing else works, that is nearly over the top. To me, it seems that there's a mixing of priorities, your own health and the health of our world population. I myself have no idea how to cure another person or a group of people when it's a theory about a cure. I only act on real time conditions, choosing a treatment that is in sync with it, it may not involve MMS at all. There are numerous messengers now, with the rise of interest in MMS. I'm sure you know the names of those speaking up, like Andreas Kalcker, and Kerri Rivera.

The use of MMS (I simply call it that since I'm familiar only with that term and with keeping 2 bottles at home, just in case, glad with the versatility of the substance) is so wide spread by now, since Jim Humble discovered its use in South America, over 70 years ago, and there are so many protocols, and... most of all... recommendations to use it as a preventive remedy, that I don't feel the need to think for the entire world population, in order to find and declare what works best.

Injecting things in one's blood isn't a simple practice, I believe, and also not without risks. I'm not saying that you've risked too much, when you know what and how to apply an injection to see how it would work out, but as far as I'm concerned, I would choose a medically trained person to advise and assist me in this, when I should choose such a method.

I'm a bit overwhelmed by the complexity of the threads in this forum. I prefer a simple approach where "old timers" and "new comers" aren't too much far apart due to familiarity with terms, methods, formulas, and all those, mostly 3-capital letter terms. It's similar to not seeing the forest through the trees, if you know what I mean. Besides, my main focus is on health and strength of the immune system through good clean food, since I'm a holistic nutritionist. To choose supplements for general diet isn't my cup of tea, for I hold supplements only useful in conditions of health that call for them. A remedy, not a daily part of a diet, and even less favourable when "others" be it doctors or friends, tell us what to take. Each person is unique, as I see it. No "one size fits all" and certainly no "one formula fits all".

Another question I have for you, when you know the answer, is about the title of this thread : Protocol 1 for C19 prevention; Drink 2 liters of water a day with 3 to 5 drops of unactDrink 2 liters of water a day with 3 to 5 drops of unactivated MMS in each liter (6 to 10 drops a day)ivated MMS in each liter (6 to 10 drops a day)

What does it mean when it's advised to drink UNACTIVATED MMS?
 

hi scott thanks for posts i find them very helpful. i dont think i would have been able to get this far without you and charlotte on here. i am taking d3k2 quercetin zinc liposomal c as well as being on heart meds and have been able to cut my diabetes meds in half. i take these meds in afternoon having dosed cds/mms bottle 6am-1-2pm when i take the vits about an hour after when i eat. i also take tramadol and amitriptyline for arthritis and stenosis of the spine and neck as needed and have cut out the use of these to maybe once a week.  i have heard about iodine deficiency and wonder whether drops could be added to the daily bottle, also dmso as the carrier for both and in what dosage. thanks.
jeff

Truthquester wrote:

Here's a table I made which compares the milligrams of CLO2 between Protocol C - C30 for COVID-19 and CDH4000, MMS Drops & The Antidote. MMS Drops & The Antidote both use MMS Drops which have been partially acidified outside the body and then are ingested. Protocol-1 uses these same drops but just allow the stomach acid to do everything internally. Notice how just 13 drops a day provides more mgs of CLO2 than C20 provides. And C20 is considered as a prevention for 1st Responders of COVID-19.

All the best,
Scott

Hello Scott, I do appreciate your sharing of information and efforts to assist others in their healing process, or with the prevention of that need.
Here I've got a few questions for you.
Today, I've had the clarity to notice that with C is meant 10 ml. with C15 15ml and with C20 20 ml That's understood.
A question I have is about what is meant with "Outside the stomach" as opposed to "Inside the stomach" Is the former use of MMS that isn't taken orally? If so, how?
Another question is about the meaning of antidote. Is that the remedy chosen for actual symptoms of SARS-Cov-2? So that the remedy placed in the blue column is chosen as a preventive measure?
Last question, what does (+/-20%) mean in the "inside stomach" columns of the table?