TOPIC:

Hi Scott

I believed you can understand my thinking when i compare CDS and CDH for using it as my protocol call CDH Plus 1000.

In healing, i would like to stick to the original as close possible because it is where the effective solution is found. And i found that by making too much variation that end up to the same path is of adding more confusion.

It would be better to teach people that MMS is capable to make it variation in the term of used without the need to change to any other protocol or out of MMS effective used.

Last benefits by maintaining both CD and SC should be one of the safest route in terms of worrying toxicity of leaching heavy metal inside body that seems possible.

As we both understood, inactivate SC is high effective against parasites but as when this parasites is killed, they do release toxic and this is where CD are more effective in clearing it up as well.

Again, i always believed Jim Humble knowledge and reasons to even not mentioned it as he may feel there is something completely not safe to ingest inactivate SC. He is the founder who research more than anyone that he could simply answer it to us be it in the book or response to our doubts. But he just cannot make up his mind. So we must assume there are possibility of un-safe used.

and yes, i used the CDH version created by you and CLO2. And been using it few years with good success. I also found that many disease response to CD without the need of SC. Only in serious cases i would add in SC and see results gets better and faster. It also help those cannot take high dose of CD or some may feel the biting sensation in throat when on stronger CD.

So Jim Humble is not wrong in his MMS as he stated the original always bring results. It means the present of both CD and SC during ingestion. But again, if we play out both CD and SC, the healing seems to be able to find tune without the need of changing protocol and the safety of MMS used will be in place as well. No one need to risk to test protocol effectiveness. The problems only lies on the amount of CD and SC one body needed for effective healing.

Hope this will get to a point of correct way to improved MMS usage and that MMS is capable to heal effectively without the need to change its originally discover methods and proven to be the best healing that can be further improved its effectiveness by knowing how to adjust both CD and SC inside MMS.

Hi Edwin,
Yes I now understand what you're trying to do. You're trying to keep the CDH as close to activated drops as possible because the drops are what Jim Humble has said works the best. So you're trying to keep the ratio of CLO2 to Sodium Chlorite the same or as close as possible to drops.

If I'm right in understanding you, then the best way to accomplish keeping that ratio about the same would be to use 1% HCl when you make your CDH. By using 1% HCl, you will be providing only enough HCl to activate the Sodium Chlorite about 12.5%, which is approximately the same amount of activation that occurs in the 30 second time period that Jim recommends. I call this type of CDH, "CDH-1%" as apposed to "CDH-2%" which uses 2% HCl and allows for an approximate 25% activation of the Sodium Chlorite. "CDH-4%" is our standard CDH which uses 4% HCl and activates approximately 50% of the Sodium Chlorite.

Of course making 1% is very easy to do; just add 1ml of 4% HCl to 3ml of pure water (ideally distilled). This will give you a total of 4ml of 1% HCl. To make 40ml of 1% HCl, add 10ml of 4% HCl to 30ml of water.

Hope that helps and thanks for all that you do Edwin.

All the best,
Scott

Actually what I mean is to keep the main principal of MMS1. Because MMS1 is the one that give the most wide range healing of diseases.

I like CDH is because I can make a volume to keep for longer used... but this CDH will soon loose out all the SC with time.

With CDH Plus 1000, I could bring back the benefits like MMS1 minus it's mixing hassle no worry of reduce benefits like MMS1.

This same concept can also be apply to original MMS1 activating method as well.

Let say if one need more available SC in MMS1, one can also adjust the ratio of activator or less activating time so that less CD is generate for ingestion.

As the whole objective is to understand that we can control CD and SC in MMS for ingestion. But maintain original MMS1 objective for safety ingestion is to have both CD and SC all the time together for oral taking.

No Edwin, CDH-1% and CDH-2% do not lose there sodium chlorite and are very stable, especially if refrigerated there won't be any loss of sodium chlorite for many months. CDH-4% does start losing it if not refrigerated after about 2 weeks.

So CDH-1% would be the closest to keeping the main principle of MMS1.

Take care,
Scott

Hi Scott;

We see the benefits of discussion to keep up the spirit of MMS1 in its original form. Possibility of bringing MMS1 healing to a new level.

Your recommendation of CDH 1% and 2% seems to be one of the solutions that is good for those who need more SC and less CD usage and may be a good choice for Autism which need more SC. So is a good solution that is still in line with MMS1 spirit. I also believed it improved the MMS1 Taste even further.

To my side, i still prefer to used your original CDH 4% of which only left CD after two week. This way, I could test if the person body received better healing with CD or SC.

Thanks for the productive discussion.

Edwin said, "This way, I could test if the person body received better healing with CD or SC."

Okay I understand Edwin, that makes good sense. And yes, thank you for the discussion too.

Scott

My way was that...

If i feel the body was responded well with CD, i will later on add lesser SC to maintain the spirit of MMS1.

If after using my CDH with little improvement, i will gradually increase the dose of SC, if it is produce faster result, i may try to double it based on my acceptance level of SC dose and possible reducing the CDH dose so that reducing the taste of MMS1. But will not totally take out CD to maintain spirit of MMS1 protocol.

Sounds like a very good approach Edwin.
Please keep us informed of what you learn.

May you and all those you help be happy and healthy
Scott

Actually i do seeing results even on late stage sarcoma cancer on stomach... I maintain CDH 3 Tubes with 8 drops of SC. Taking MMS2 plus some herbal remedies. Already into 3 months without seeing cancer occurrence for now....