file Study: 90 percent of health information on Wikipedia is wrong

  • jemco
  • jemco's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
More
29 May 2014 00:06 #44786 by jemco
Study: 90 percent of health information on Wikipedia is wrong was created by jemco
Here's the source:
www.jaoa.org/content/114/5/334.full

Many of us have seen the lies on Wikipedia regarding MMS. Well, now we have further evidence of Wikipedia lies.
Here's my local news report on the article:
5/28/14 12:47 PM
If you have a question about your health, do you use Wikipedia?

The crowd-sourcing online encyclopedia is a popular tool for some students and others to find a quick answer, but it may be a destination to avoid for health information.

A study published in The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association tested the reliability of the crowd-sourced entries on Wikipedia.

Researchers looked at the 10 most costly medical conditions in the country – like lung cancer, back pain, and osteoarthritis.

They found the Wikipedia entries contradict medical research for peer-reviewed journals about 90 percent of the time – information on nine out of 10 entries had errors.

But it’s not just people at home using it – the study found that 47 to 70 percent of physicians and medical students use it as a reference.

The researchers conclude that caution should be exercised when using websites such as Wikipedia for any medical questuh on traject
• Easy, free way to support Jim Humble, Genesis II Church, MMS

• Jim Humble's MMS Books
• MMS Video Course
• MMS Testimonials
• MMS Newsletter
The following user(s) said Thank You: Steve, pam, ix, gabyher, mariali

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • jemco
  • jemco's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
More
01 Jun 2014 20:14 #44905 by jemco
Replied by jemco on topic Study: 90 percent of health information on Wikipedia is wrong
I have attached the file as a pdf, to provide access in case the originating web site removes access to it.
• Easy, free way to support Jim Humble, Genesis II Church, MMS

• Jim Humble's MMS Books
• MMS Video Course
• MMS Testimonials
• MMS Newsletter
The following user(s) said Thank You: pam, ix

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
01 Mar 2018 17:12 #57767 by nigelisok
Replied by nigelisok on topic Study: 90 percent of health information on Wikipedia is wrong
that low, eh? ;)
Nigel Watson freethinker skype orbizen2 727.493.1990
Blog ORBizen Memo orbizenmemo.blogspot.com/ 2007-2011
"It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society”-Krishnamurti
"Life has but 2 things to offer us: time and each other." -NjW

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
01 Mar 2018 20:38 #57768 by gabyher
Replied by gabyher on topic Study: 90 percent of health information on Wikipedia is wrong
Wikipedia is an effective, low cost disinformation tool. I don't use it at all. The 'errors' are not errors, they are lies.
The following user(s) said Thank You: fourfingerz, alloplant, mariali

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
08 Feb 2021 05:29 #67831 by SM
Replied by SM on topic Study: 90 percent of health information on Wikipedia is wrong
Probably best not to use wikipedia for anything other than entertainment although the hard sciences like chemistry and biology are generally ok. Any topics with vested interests like politics and big pharma are not useful.

The WHO recently redefined herd-immunity to mean a population protected by vaccines, so that pretty much sums up the sorry state of wikipedia health information.
The following user(s) said Thank You: John1

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
09 Feb 2021 12:12 #67848 by mart1n
Replied by mart1n on topic Study: 90 percent of health information on Wikipedia is wrong
The foundation of atheism and secularity is based on scientism, which is the most dangerous religion because people are not aware they believe in various sciences that are believed to aid humanity.
Belief in science = scientism. Practicing science is something entirely different.
Evolutionism, BigBangism, Democratism, Historyism, Journalism, Virologyism etc. All blind faith.
The secular masses looking down on traditional religion, or spirituality, on basis of not being conscious of ones own participation in the world wide church of scientism.

This is why it's almost impossible to explain to people corona is fake. People BELIEVE they are NOT religious about anything!
The following user(s) said Thank You: Chris Jackson

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
06 May 2021 17:12 #68869 by ClO2.nl
Replied by ClO2.nl on topic Study: 90 percent of health information on Wikipedia is wrong
Wikipedia is open info: you can add and change info. I also did that on the topic censuur of wikipedia nl. I mentioned as example that the news from Mexico and Bolivia is being censored. ;)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
06 May 2021 21:14 #68872 by CLO2
Replied by CLO2 on topic Study: 90 percent of health information on Wikipedia is wrong
They change it back after you make a change. Don't waste you time with Wikipedia. 

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
13 Jun 2021 14:11 #69437 by ClO2.nl
Replied by ClO2.nl on topic Study: 90 percent of health information on Wikipedia is wrong
No they don't do that aways: nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censuur_%28informatie%29
This part of the topic is mine: "Censuur wegens nepnieuws"

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
25 Jul 2021 18:05 #70214 by AZVamp
Replied by AZVamp on topic Study: 90 percent of health information on Wikipedia is wrong

They change it back after you make a change. Don't waste you time with Wikipedia. 
 
Yes, and it's gotten worse. The founder of Wikipedia was on Fox News yesterday. He's disgusted with the lame stream media and what they've done lately to this resource.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.280 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum

MMS Health Recovery Guidebook

The MMS HEALTH RECOVERY GUIDEBOOK is Jim’s latest book.  It provides the latest information on how to safely use MMS.  Click the book image to order your copy today.

Jim's Blog

  • How does MMS affect bacteria in the body?

    Published on: July 24, 2026

    First facts, MMS does not kill friendly bacteria. What is the difference in useful bacteria and the harmful stuff? Well the feces of the useful bacteria is not poisonous and the feces of the harmful bacteria is poisonous and that is what makes one sick and causes the problems. Poisons have long chains of atoms …

  • MMS/CD and Plastics

    Published on: July 12, 2026

    Question: How does MMS interact with various plastics? Jim: In regards to your question about plastics, we really cannot give you a “sure bet” answer. This is because the world of plastics is vast, and like so many things in our environment, it’s difficult to know what is really what. To give you an idea, …

  • MMS/CD, Bacteria and Viruses

    Published on: July 5, 2026

    Question: Does MMS/CD kill bacteria and virus? Jim: Antibacterial drugs can sometimes stop bacterial [infections] diseases but medicine has yet to develop anything to stop viral infections. Thankfully, MMS/CD has been known to stop both viral and bacterial diseases. For either viral or bacterial infections, begin with the Starting Procedure and continue following the Health …

  • Importance of Following the Plan

    Published on: June 27, 2026

    Every week at least one new person approaches me with the question will MMS/CD help overcome some new disease. MMS/CD is an oxidizer that fits into the operation of the body in the exact right chemical balance to kill diseases and their poisons and eradicate heavy metals. Drugs must somehow attack the nucleus of the …

  • More is Not Always Better

    Published on: June 9, 2026

    In my books, there are times when one might need to take larger doses of MMS/CD. In Protocol 2000, for example you’ll find maximum dosage amounts. Some might take this to mean the more MMS one takes the better. But this is NOT necessarily so! More is not necessarily better, you need to listen to …

  • Nutritional Research Information

    Published on: May 27, 2026

    Note: The following was written by Jim around 2012, and we are putting it here as food for thought. The subject of “nutrition” in the world today, is quite subjective, with a wide range of factors weighing into this equation, such as how the food is grown, handled, stored, processed, etc. etc. In addition, we …