TOPIC:

Hello dear members and ministers,
Can anybody give me a instruction of making CDS according to the feedback system of Andreas Kalcker?
Many thanks

Rob S.

Taken from Andreas Kalckers website:
andreaskalcker.com/en/health/cds/114-cds-2.html

CDS - Chlorindioxide as advanced solution
Many people are faced with the dilemma of whether to choose CDS or classical activated sodium Clorite (as well known as MMS) to your needs.


Image from my Book: The fastest way to create big amounts of CDS

1. Reaction chamber where you mix sodium clorite and weak hidrocloric acid ( NaClO2 + HCl )
2. Cold mineral (or destilled) water below 11º celsius
3. Airtight tupperbox
4. Security airbag in case of deflagration
5. Aquarium air compressor (best with silicone valves due to corrosision)

What are the main differences ?
The main advantage of CDS regarding classical activated sodium Clorite is firstly purity. Being only distilled the gas in water practically residues of the basic components are non existent and although the quality of the ingedients are of inferior quality to produce CDS serve as only the gas dissolved in the water needed .

CDS is the end product of a reaction, ie it will not react creating more chlorine dioxide in the stomach , unlike what happens with classical activated sodium Clorite (as well known as MMS). Once ingested classical activated sodium Clorite does make a secondary reaction in the stomach, as we have seen before. In some cases in susceptible individuals , this increase in stomach gas may notice discomfort in the form of a nasty burp. CDS also has less flavor as classical activated sodium Clorite mixture and therefore can be ingested in large quantities without being repulsive.
Why there is a need to be taken in larger quantities ?

Mainly for terminal diseases where CDS has apparently given very encouraging results. One of the main effects of chlorine dioxide in the body 's detoxification capacity , ie to remove toxin.

What is the mechanism of action ? (simplyfied)
It does so through oxidation, as we remember that it is nothing more than a combustion process . This is how we burn toxins.

What if we burn a toxin ?
The toxic component which becomes a different component .

It is not the same iron to iron oxide , ie the physical condition has changed .
What effect does this have on the body?

We as an example the case of zinc. As a pure metal it is harmful to the body , but it is not the same as zinc oxide used by the body to absorb vitamin C.

The problem with having a terminal illness such as cancer, is that usually people do not die of cancer itself per se, but rather by a liver-kidney failure , ie a collapse of the system filtering the blood due to an too large amount of acidic toxins released by the cancer itself , simplified it means the patient is dying from poisoning. Hence the positive effect of chlorine dioxide , as in the form of classical activated sodium Clorite or CDS , both are capable of oxidizing acidic toxins. In many cases the problem is that there are so many toxins that taking a classical activated sodium Clorite dose (as well known as MMS) has to be so high that produces intestinal problems , ie diarrhea. This diarrhea may be caused by intestinal acidosis. The pH of the MMS is lower than the pH of the CDS, and the CDS pH is below pH of CDI ( that is inyectable) . Thus we believe that to have greater amounts of chlorine dioxide in the body of the "animal to treat " in question must monitor acidity.

Another basic difference between CDS and classical activated sodium Clorite is also its quantification. While classical activated sodium Clorite (as well known as MMS) uses drops, the CDS or CDI always is applied in milliliters , which is a more professional and accurate . The dimension between droplets of different manufacturers differ up to 70 % between them so it is better in this case to use universal measure.

Also, here is Jims method for making CDS:



How to make daily bottle of CDS for Protocol 1000:

Question. Kerry Rivera cds method is no longer valid? The one with wine glass.

Making 3,000ppm CDS Part #1 - June, 2013
by Kerri Rivera at cdautism.org


Making 3,000ppm CDS Part #2 - June, 2013
by Kerri Rivera at cdautism.org

I love this Kerry Method, is more easy to do and cheaper

Do not recall where the method came from, but one of my favourite ways to make my daily bottle of CDS, compatible with the Protocol 1000:

Before I go to bed:
1. Take a regular plastic cork from a soda bottle or whatever
2. Add 24 drops of Sodium chlorite 28% and 24 drops of activator; Citric acid 50% or HCl 4% in the cork
3. Take a big jar with a functional tight plastic lid, and fill up with 1L (33 fluid ounces) of water
4. Put the cork with the activated MMS into the jar and let it float on the 1L of water
5. Close tight the jar lid, and make sure it is properly sealed and does not leak (!)
6. Place the jar in the fridge
7. Enjoy your CDS solution the next morning, as the Cl02 gas will have gone from the cork and into the 1L of water.

IX
Wow, that a good one, Let tested for concentration , But in this case we need to divide 1000/24 to get the exact amount of milliliter equivalent to one drop. Also this one does not have the SC added at the end for stabilization. That in my point of view will make the difference between Kerry/Andrea CDS.

I don't think we are adding the SC to the CDS for stabilization any longer, GJP - Andreas told me in an email once that it just turned the CDS back to CD -

People are still using Kerri's method. She used the equipment she had on hand. We do have a series of CDS "making" protocols on the forum - ultimately, I believe, the overnight method was chosen for Kerri's people because it's actually easier, although it does take longer than the heat method.