× ### Research Section Disclaimer

None of the products, protocols or methods here have been approved by Jim Humble or the Genesis II Church. This is the research forum and was set up by the Genesis 2 Church for those wanting to discuss and experiment with MMS, other Church Sacraments and new complimentary technologies. Any experimentation that you personally do is at your own risk. Before anything is submitted to the Church for approval it must be first approved by Jim Humble in writing and posted under his account. The main source for approved material, protocols etc, is in Jim Humble's latest book at http://www.jhbooks.org Each person using this Forum is considered to be completely responsible for themselves and their own personal health. Any experimentation that you personally do is at your own risk.

Question MMS selectively damages cell membranes of pathogens

02 May 2011 12:57 #2415 by Andreas
I have bought the eBook "The Master Mineral solution of the 3rd Millennium" at March 30.
It is very, very good. Since I read about MMS at March 22 2011, I am a strong supporter of it.

Alas I have noted some minor unclarity in the new book which I want to discuss here:

On page 159 there is a text about cell walls (membranes). I have googled the biological data and found the following:

cell membrane thickness is 3-10 nm:
www.chelationtherapyonline.com/articles/p170.htm

cell wall thickness is 20-80 nm:
webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:0rASQQMLGjUJ:hypertextbook.com/facts/2003/AlonaVorobyov.shtml+thick+human+cell+wall&cd=9&hl=de&ct=clnk&gl=de&client=firefox-a&source=www.google.de

human organ wall thickness is about 1 mm

Jim Humbles states in the text:
membranes of pathogens are less than (1/10 000) inch = 2540 nanometers (nm) thick,
walls of body components are (1/32) inch = 793750 nanometers = 0.79375 millimeters thick

So, the statements are not false, but the membranes of pathogens and of human cells are actually even about (1/5 000 000) inch thick,
but bacteria have cell walls of 20-80 nm thickness, human and animal cells have no cell walls. In the text there is no distinction
between organ walls and cell membranes.
So the argument does not seem to work out. There must be a different reason for chlorine dioxide to not
damage human cells.

Well, I am a mathematician, not a biologist, so I may have missed something.
What is supposed to be the main reason of MMS´s selectiveness?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

03 May 2011 03:22 #2422 by brtanner
I think that the main factor in the selective action of chlorine dioxide (ClO2) is the low ORP (oxygen reduction potential) of .95 volts that it has. This means that in the conversion of the molecule to the chlorite ion (ClO2-), it pulls an electron from molecules only if they are weakly bonded.

In addition, ClO2 is said to affect enzymes inside the cell wall of anaerobic bacteria - nitrate reductase is often mentioned - when the enzymes are neutralized, the bacteria suffocate. Aerobic bacteria, which include the "beneficial intestinal flora" are not affected this way.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Victor

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

27 Feb 2013 20:12 #31110 by adi

brtanner wrote: Aerobic bacteria, which include the "beneficial intestinal flora" are not affected this way.


Thanks for that information.. would you say some gut bacteria would be negatively affected (killed) by the MMS, perhaps it's not all aerobic?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.