Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
### Research Section Disclaimer

None of the products, protocols or methods here have been approved by Jim Humble. This is the research forum and was set up for those wanting to discuss and experiment with MMS, and new complimentary technologies. Any experimentation that you personally do is at your own risk. Before anything is submitted for approval it must be first approved by Jim Humble in writing and posted under his account. The main source for approved material, protocols etc, is in Jim Humble's latest book at www.jhbooks.org Each person using this Forum is considered to be completely responsible for themselves and their own personal health. Any experimentation that you personally do is at your own risk.
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2

TOPIC:

Re: MMS & Liposomal Encapsulation Technology (LET) 23 Aug 2012 04:34 #21706

  • Edi
  • Edi's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Junior Member
  • Junior Member
  • Posts: 20
  • Thank you received: 15
I take megadoses of Vitamin C (about 20g/day) and can speak to the unrivaled potency of LET.

TIP: One can also use an immersion blender to achieve the same result without the pricey ultrasonic machine. Directions on youtube.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Re: MMS & Liposomal Encapsulation Technology (LET) 23 Aug 2012 08:00 #21714

  • CLO2
  • CLO2's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 5379
  • Thank you received: 4247
edit
The following user(s) said Thank You: Edi

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Last edit: by CLO2.

Re: MMS & Liposomal Encapsulation Technology (LET) 04 Sep 2012 12:13 #22524

  • woofy
  • woofy's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Elite Member
  • Elite Member
  • Posts: 284
  • Thank you received: 195
Hi Charlotte, wondering how your progress is going with MMS & Liposomal Encapsulation Technology (LET)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Re: MMS & Liposomal Encapsulation Technology (LET) 04 Sep 2012 16:32 #22540

  • CLO2
  • CLO2's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 5379
  • Thank you received: 4247
edit
The following user(s) said Thank You: jbnet

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Last edit: by CLO2.

Re: MMS & Liposomal Encapsulation Technology (LET) 04 Sep 2012 19:09 #22550

  • jbnet
  • jbnet's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
  • Posts: 127
  • Thank you received: 72
Charlotte,
Keep up the good work on the video slide show.
There is much interest in this project....

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Re: MMS & Liposomal Encapsulation Technology (LET) 05 Sep 2012 04:56 #22584

  • polo
  • polo's Avatar
  • Offline
  • New Member
  • New Member
  • Posts: 12
  • Thank you received: 21
I have not done any work with activated MMS as a liposomal solution as of yet, but I have CDS. I wanted to use Chlorine Dioxide test strips to see if CD was reduced afterwards. In theory, I should think that liposomal encapsulation would cause a decrease in Chlorine Dioxide readings on these strips.

I did some experimenting with CDS (chlorine dioxide solution) last winter in liposomal form. I was not too happy with the outcome. First, I mixed up lecithin to Brooks bradley specs and added CDS (with minimum of agitation) to it to get a 250ppm solution. Then I took the lecithin/CDS batch and put part in a ultrasonic bath in a sealed glass beaker--sonicating for 10 minutes. I took another batch and run it twice through an antique pharmaceutical homogenizer (because I was not sure if the ultrasonic waves would degas the solution) and then tested both batches with chlorine dioxide strips afterwards.

I found that both the ultrasonic batch (10 minutes sonicating) and the antique manual homogenizer produced similar results. They both seemed to reduce the ppm of CD in half after each's operation. If I started out with an unprocessed solution of 250ppm, the after-ultrasonic bath formula would test approx 100ppm. Same was true with the homogenizer batch. However, I also tested the unprocessed (neither sonicated or homogenized) lecithin/CDS formula that stood for an hour and found that the chlorine dioxide tested less in it as well, but not to the degree of the ultrasonic/homogenizer batches. Accordingly, I suspect that lecithin some how reacts with chlorine dioxide and degrades it--perhaps, lipid peroxidation? "Lipid peroxidation refers to the oxidative degradation of lipids. It is the process in which free radicals "steal" electrons from the lipids in cell membranes, resulting in cell damage." This leads me to think that CDS may be a very poor canidate for llipsomal encapsulation technology.

The final solution of liposomal CDS seemed to be much more whitish in color and more liquid as compared to the original yellowish color and viscous nature of lecithin or as it is seen in our lipo-C. This may be a clue that CDS is oxidizing the lecithin solution? I tested my liposomal CDS about a week after I made it. It has been stored in a sealed bottle in the frig and it read under 10ppm chlorine dioxide. So, it is degrading further and rapidly from the 100ppm of a week ago when ususally the opposite occurs with a liipo solution in storage. With normal liposomes, you get a breakdown of the liposomes in storage and a leaking of contents which would mean one should actualy see a higher ppm reading not a lesser one. Most curious!
The following user(s) said Thank You: pam, fourfingerz, Tomas

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Last edit: by polo.
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2